911 was a controlled demolition executed by the Deep State - 2 minute video

 

911 was a controlled demolition executed by the Deep State - 2 minute video

https://vaticancatholic.com/911-was-a-controlled-demolition-executed-by-the-deep-state/

https://vaticancatholic.com/

Pope Francis supports public heresy and schism when he does not affirm Vatican Council II interpreted rationally in harmony with the past Magisterium. It is not Magisterial when Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly. He must correct the mistake in public. Also when the Synod interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly, it is schism. It is schism with the Magisterium over the centuries.

 

When the Synod supports polygamy and adultery it is a mortal sin. It is schism with the Magisterium over the centuries. But also when the Synod interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly, it is schism. It is schism with the Magisterium over the centuries. Since it changes the original interpretation of the Nicene Creed and rejects the Athanasius Creed. There are false interpretations of the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X.

There is a new interpretation of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. It changes the understanding of Magisterial Documents, Creeds and Catechisms. It makes the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, obsolete.

This is the present official and public heresy of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. It has been the political position on doctrine and theology for the popes from Paul VI to Francis. This is papal schism.

We now know that the norm is the rational interpretation of the baptism of desire (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16).

The norm is a rational interpretation of BOD and I.I when they are mentioned in the Catechisms of Trent ( BOD) and Pius X ( I.I) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 847-848-invincible ignorance).

We now know that the norm is the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, and NA 2, GS 22 etc).

So Sister Nathalie Bequart, Consultant to the Vatican on the Synod, is in schism when she says that the doctrines of the Synod are based upon Vatican Council II- and means only Vatican Council II irrational and not rational.

Cardinal Hollerich and Cardinal Greco are in schism when they do not affirm Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.

Pope Francis supports public heresy and schism when he does not affirm Vatican Council II interpreted rationally in harmony with the past Magisterium.

It is not Magisterial when Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly. He must correct the mistake in public.  -Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 20, 2018

CDF is a congregation for doctrinal confusion : Ladaria supports heresy and offers Holy Mass

 

 
 
 
 
 
We have a Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) who interprets the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( invincible ignorance) as being a rupture with the same Catechism saying all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.Since for him being saved in invincible ignorance refers to known cases. For me they are simply hypothetical.
 

Then for him the Baltimore Catechism ( baptism of desire) contradicts the Syllabus of Errors (outside the Church there is no salvation).For me there is no contradiction since the baptism of desire can only be a theoretical case in our reality.
 

 If there are no known people saved with the baptism of desire how can the baptism of desire be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus?  But for them at  the CDF, it would be an exception.
 

For him Unitatits Redintigatio (Decree on Ecumenism) 3 would be a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors (ecumenism of return). Since he would assume UR 3 refers to known Christians saved outside the Church in 'imperfect communion with the Church'.For me UR 3 can only refer to a hypothetical case. It is speculation in 2018 and not a visible Protestant.If he was saved for me he would be in Heaven. 
 

So with this irrational reasoning it is no surprise that Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj interprets Vatican Council II(LG 8) as a rupture with the dogma EENS.So there is a rupture with the missionaries in the 16th century. He openly made this mistake at the Placuet Deo Press Conference (March 1,2018). This was pubic heresy.
 

So with visible- for -him cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance, he also changes the interpretation of the Creeds.This is first class heresy.It is a mortal sin of faith.
 

 
 
 
 

The same reasoning and heresy is there in the statements of Bishop Kevin Rhoades the new Chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) Doctrinal Committee.Like Cardinal Ladaria he refuses to recant.The USCCB made a mistake in the Fr.Peter C.Phan case when it assumed unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, were objective exceptions to EENS. Cardinal Donald Wuerl, was the Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee and he supported this error.

The same error is made by Archbishop Corrado Lorefice, the Archbishop of Palermo, Italy.Lorefice has excommunicated Fr.Alessandro Minutella for doctrinal or unclear reasons.There are no specific reasons and the CDF will not comment.Munitella accused the Archbishop of heresy and there was no comment from Cardinal Ladaria.

Cardinal Ladaria is now the head of the congregation for doctrinal confusion.

His office has been made powerless and useless and he overlooks heresy and sacrilege.Since he cannot teach the truth for political reasons he should resign.

He has inherited the errors of Cardinal Ratzinger, Cardinal Ottaviani and other Prefects of the CDF.

He supports modernism which can be read the papers of the International Theological Commission.Then he offers Mass with this public scandal not corrected.

He condones heresy and his Mass is sacrilege.-Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 19, 2018

CDF Prefect and present two popes violate the Principle of Non Contradiction ( Graphics)  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/cdf-prefect-and-presetnt-two-popes.html

DECEMBER 19, 2018

Cardinal Ladaria needs to resign instead he is holding doctrinal talks with the SSPX (Graphics)   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/cardinal-ladaria-needs-to-resign.html

  December 19, 2018

CDF Prefect must recant or resign - as a good Catholic(Graphics) 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/cdf-prefect-must-recant-or-resign-as.html

 

DECEMBER 19, 2018

The Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) does not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) in harmony with Vatican Council II. He is holding doctrinal talks with the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) when he should be asked to recant or resign   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-prefect-of-congregation-for.html

 

 

DECEMBER 19, 2018

 

The secret Vatican-SSPX doctrinal talks are not being made public, even though both sides claim to be Catholic.Cardinal Ladaria uses an irrationality to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.So deception is in his interest

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-secret-vatican-sspx-doctrinal-talks.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/search?q=CDF+heresy

------------------------------------------------------------------

JUNE 22, 2019

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Fr. Georges de Laire, support irrationality( i.e hypothetical cases are physically visible exceptions to EENS) to create a rupture with the past exclusive ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return,traditional mission, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. This is a mortal sin of faith.The CDF is trying to stoke a schism for the SPLC, ADL and Satan.

Fr.Georges de Laire, ,Vicar for Canon Affairs in the Diocese of Manchester, USA has said in the Catholic Herald, UK, that he met with the Under Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), last month, and that the Prohibitions against the St. Benedict Center would continue.It means he does not accept the Doctrinal Statement of the SBC posted on their website.The issue he said is extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

It means the CDF and Bishop Libasci want the SBC, and all religious communities in the diocese,  to state that they accept :-

TWO QUESTIONS

1.Unknown and invisible cases in 2019 of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known and physically visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.So as Pope Benedict said in March 2016 (Avvenire) that EENS today is no more like it was like for the missionaries in the 16th century.There was a development with Vatican Council II ( interpreted irrationally).

2.Vatican Council II contradicts EENS since unknown cases of non Catholics allegedly saved outside the Church in 2019, as mentioned in LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are practical and literal exceptions to EENS.

This is the irrational way in which th SBC has to accept EENS and Vatican Council II , to be considered a Catholic in good standing with the Church.

So the SBC have to state that Fr. Leonard Feeney was not orthodox and rational but instead the Holy Office(CDF) in 1949 was correct on theology and doctrine.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and Fr. Georges de Laire, are supporting irrationality( i.e hypothetical cases are physically visible exceptions to EENS) to create a rupture with the past exclusive ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return,traditional mission, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.1 This is a mortal sin of faith.The CDF is trying to stoke a schism for the SPLC, ADL and Satan.

The St. Benedict Center(SBC) have simply to put two questions to the cardinals and bishops, and the average Catholic,and the response will be that there are no personally known and physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church over the last 50 years.There are none this year.
The CDF needs to apologize for the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Bishop Marcel Lefebvre.Since BOD, BOB and I.I cannot be exceptions to EENS,they do not exist in our reality. Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office(CDF) wrong.

Also Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc , interpreted as being exceptions to EENS, is irrational and heretical.So Archbishop Lefebvre was correct in rejecting this interpretation of the Council, which was approved by the CDF and the Left.

Pope Pius VI and Pope Benedict/Cardinal Ratzinger did not correct the error.However today a correction can made in public.The CDF made a factual error in the case of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

-Lionel Andrades

1
Pope Pius VI and Pope Benedict/Cardinal Ratzinger did not correct the error.However today a correction can made in public.The CDF made a factual error in the case of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/pope-pius-vi-and-pope-benedictcardinal.html

________________________________________

MAY 15, 2018

CDF still does not comment : Cardinal Ladaria made an objective mistake on March 1, 2018, LG 8 is not an exception to EENS

It is now understood by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) that possibilities of salvation are not real people in 2018.Possibilities of non Catholics being saved outside the Catholic Church are not real people known to us.They can only be known to God if they exist.

So Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth)is an unknown case.It refers to an unknown person.

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j. Prefect of the CDF made a mistake on March 1,2018 at the Press Conference for Placuit Deo( see video) when he said LG 8 was an exception to the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church, the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

There is no denial from the CDF.

There cannot be any denial.

Since it is obvious that there are no known cases of non Catholics saved with elements of sanctification and truth(LG 8).

Similarly there are no known non Catholics or non Christians saved outside the Catholic Church where it is allegedly believed that the true Church of Christ subsists(LG 8).

It was false for Cardinal Ladaria to mention LG 8( subsist it  in ) when asked by an AP journalist, if the Church still teaches that it has the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.In his vague style he said that the Church today no more speaks in terms of superiority and cited Lumen Gentium 8.

There are so many reports on line which state that LG 8 refers to theoretical and speculative cases only.So it is not an exception to EENS.

There is no comment from the CDF.

-Lionel Andrades

  

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/cdf-still-does-not-comment-cardinal.html

_________________________________

AUGUST 31, 2021

France, Germany, Poland, Hungary... need to re-interpret Vatican Council II rationally : USA and Britain also must use the rational premise

 

taylormarshall.com/2020/02/375-bp-athanasius-schneider-dr-taylor-marshall-discuss-theology-liturgy-podcast.html

AUGUST 31, 2021

Pope Francis is in schism with the past Magisterium which did not interpret the baptism of desire as being a literal case. So for them there were no exceptions to the traditionalist exclusivist ecclesiology.Bishop Athanasius Schneider told Dr. Taylor Marshall in an interview that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire.This is a complete U-turn with the common interpretation of Vatican Council II(LG 14 etc).

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/pope-francis-is-in-schism-with-past.html

AUGUST 31, 2021

Pope Benedict has always supported the German Synod with his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall have overturned the interpretation. For the German bishops Lumen Gentium 14( the baptism of desire) is an exception to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For Schneider and Marshall it is not

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/pope-benedict-has-always-supported.html

AUGUST 30, 2021

Pope Benedict needs to be honest and apologize to the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/pope-benedict-needs-to-be-honest-and_30.html

AUGUST 29, 2021

Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall say there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire but the German Synodal path is based upon there being literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) in the present times

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-and-dr_29.html

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome,

Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-and-dr_28.html

____________________

 AUGUST 8, 2021

This is official schism, ecclesiastic schism. Pope Francis and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must issue a correction and admit they are wrong

We have a pope in schism since he uses a false premise, instead of a rational one, to interpret Vatican Council II and so create a false break with Tradition. With the false premise, exceptions are created for the Athanasius Creed ( all need Catholic faith for salvation), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( with no exceptions) and the Syllabus of Errors with no exceptions.This is official schism with the past Magisterium.It is created by confusing hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being non hypothetical but objective examples of salvation outside the Church, when such cases do not exist in our reality and can only be known to God.

How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake and confuse what is invisible as being visible, implicit as being explicit and hypothetical as being objective ? It means non Catholics saved in Heaven, allegedly outside the Catholic Church; without faith and the baptism of water, are also visible on earth for them to be practical exceptions to the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.They are in two places at the same time i.e in Heaven and on earth and are physically visible ? If they were not physically visible there could not be exceptions for EENS, the Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.

This is official schism, ecclesiastic schism. Pope Francis and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must issue a correction and admit they are wrong. – Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 7, 2021

Pope Francis is in schism-Vatican Council II is being interpreted with a fake premise to create a fake rupture with Tradition . Traditionis Custode also imposes the error : The error needs to be corrected with the rational premise

 

POPE FRANCIS IS IN SCHISM - VATICAN COUNCIL II IS BEING INTERPRETED WITH A FAKE PREMISE TO CREATE A FAKE RUPTURE WITH TRADITION: TRADITIONIS CUSTODE ALSO IMPOSES THE ERROR : THE ERROR NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED WITH THE RATIONAL PREMISE.

Pope Francis was in schism at the National Cathechectical Center, Italy (Jan 30,2021) when he said that Vatican Council II had to be accepted as he interpreted it i.e with a fake premise.He said that his interpretation of Vatican Council II( with the fake premise) which produces a rupture with the past Magisterium- was Magisterial.
He reiterated that the interpretation of the Council with the false premise, which produces a rupture with the Athansius Creed( all need Catholic faith for salvation),changes the meaning of the Nicene and Apostles Creed( we believe in three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins which exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church hence there are exceptions for EENS), and a re-interpretation of the Catechisms – was the Magisterium.
This is schism since with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II there is a break with ‘the true Church’ represented by the Creeds, Catechisms, dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and other Magisterial documents intepreted rationally.
To reject the Athanasius Creed and change the understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, is first class heresy, in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II(Ad Tuendum Fidem). It is schism in the Church.

This is a scandal.Pope Francis needs to go for Confession and recant.

He could announce that he interprets Vatican Council II with the rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion and so there is no schism with the past Magisterium, the popes and saints on doctrine and dogma.In particular there is no break with the past ecclesiocenterism of the Catholic Church.
In this way Pope Francis would return to the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology without rejecting Vatican Council II, interpreted with the rational premise.
Pope Francis says in the Letter which accompanies Traditionis Custode :

A recent stage of this dynamic was constituted by Vatican Council II where the Catholic episcopate came together to listen and to discern the path for the Church indicated by the Holy Spirit. To doubt the Council is to doubt the intentions of those very Fathers who exercised their collegial power in a solemn manner cum Petro et sub Petro in an ecumenical council, and, in the final analysis, to doubt the Holy Spirit himself who guides the Church.- Letter of Pope Francis which accompanies Traditionis Custode.

https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/letters/2021/documents/20210716-lettera-vescovi-liturgia.html

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a false rupture with Tradition and he calls it the work of the Holy Spirit.
How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake and use a false premise to interpret LG 14( baptism of desire) and LG 16( invincible ignorance),for example ?
For me LG 14 and LG 16 refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases always. They are always speculative and not real people saved outside the Church in the present times, 1965-2021. This is something obvious.

How can LG 14, LG 16 etc be exceptions to EENS, the Athanasius Creed and Syllabus of Errors ? Yet this is how he interprets Vatican Council II and it is different from the rational way I interpret the Council.I consider the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the rational premise Magisterial, since it is not a rupture with the past Magisterium. Pope Francis cannot say the same.

EIGHTY TWO YEARS BACK

Eighty two years back Pope Pius XII allowed doctrine and dogma to be changed in the Catholic Church in exchange for peace and security. He did not defend Fr. Leonard Feeney and allowed the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to say that unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were known exceptions to the centuries old strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). EENS was based upon the Bible teachings in John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.
So the New Theology was outside the Church there is salvation.

This meant the teachings on ecumenism, other religions, Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation and exclusive salvation would have to change.The Zionists could be present in 1960-1965 at Vatican Council II.The Church had surrendered.
Then non Catholics were allowed to be professors at the pontifical universities in Rome, beginning with the John Lateran University.

In 1949, the time of surrender, the popes Benedict, John Paul II and Francis were young.They became cardinals in a Church, which was separated from the State because of a change in doctrine in 1949.
Now if that doctrine is restored to its original, with a rational premise, we have an ecumenism of return, 16th century EENS, the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislatioin and the non separation of Church and State based on the there being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So the priority would be that all be formal members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.
It means we do not not reject Vatican Council II but re interpret it in harmony with the pre-1949 Catholic Churh. We undo what was lost 82 years back.The Council is no more an ally of the liberals.
With the error Pope Francis and the liberals and even traditionalists are maintaining division in the Church.

JOHN HENRY WESTON AND SBC AND SSPX

John Henry Weston had a good program recently on the subject outside the Church there is no salvation .He can now work for creating unity in the Catholic Church but also answer if Pope Francis is in public schism.
The Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) accepts extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with exceptions and the St. Benedict Centers(SBC) accept EENS with no exceptions.Both groups are Catholic.
For the SSPX, the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance (I.I) are exceptions for EENS and for the SBC they are not exceptions.
If you discuss this issue with either of them they will go into their specific theology, defending the founders of their communities.

How can we create unity betweem these two groups ? One of them has to be wrong on doctrine.Similarly Pope Francis or I am in error on this issue.

The SSPX will cite the present two popes who project the BOD and I.I as exceptions to EENS. The SBC will cite the past popes, many of them, who did not project BOD and I.I as exceptions to EENS.
Now after Vatican Council II(1965) and the Fr. Leonard Feeney case in Boston (1949) we know that there are no physically visible cases of the BOD and I.I in our reality.We cannot see or meet any one saved outside the Church with BOD and I.I. So BOD and I.I could not have been practical exceptions to EENS in 1949 or 1965.Someone made a mistake.
It was only be confusing what was speculative (BOD and I.I) as being non speculative and objective, that practical exceptions ( visible cases of being saved with BOD and I.I) were created for EENS.In this way the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church was made obsolete.Ths is the point that John Henry Weston, Editor in Chief at Life Site News, must bring out in questions and discussions with the SSPX and SBC.

It will have a direct bearing on how he personally will interprets Vatican Council II.Will LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II be exceptions for EENS or will they not be exceptions, for him ?

Is Pope Francis rational or irrational on Vatican Council II ? Is there schism or no schism ? What does he think?. The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Peter Kwasniewski, Fr.John Zuhlsdorf and Michael Matt is also schismatic and so is the interpretation of the FSSP and SSPX.So they overlook the schism of Pope Francis, when he also interprets the Council with an irrational premise,to create a calculated break with Tradition( EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc) and the traditionalists and liberals do the same. -Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 6, 2021

When Archbishop Augustine di Noia interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise it is not Magisterial. The Holy Spirit cannot confuse hypothetical cases as being objective and visible in the present times (2021) and then reject Tradition, exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, the Creeds, Catechisms,EENS etc. This is a type of official apostasy.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/vatican-city-cns-pope-francis-letter.html

 AUGUST 5, 2021

Repost : Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a false rupture with Tradition and he calls it the work of the Holy Spirit, in the Letter which accompanies Traditionis Custode.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/repost-pope-francis-interprets-vatican.html

________
________

 AUGUST 28, 2019

Bradley Eli, M.Div., Ma.Th interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise to create a non traditional and heretical conclusion and wants the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) to do the same

Bradley Eli, M.Div., Ma.Th interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise to create a non traditional and heretical conclusion and he wants the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) to do the same.

POPE FRANCIS: SSPX MUST ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II AND THE NEW MASS

by Bradley Eli, M.Div., Ma.Th.  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  July 5, 2017    

CDL. MÜLLER: "ON MAY 20, 2017, THE SOVEREIGN PONTIFF APPROVED THESE DECISIONS"

ROME (ChurchMilitant.com) - Pope Francis is requiring that the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) accept an orthodox interpretation of Vatican Council II and the validity of the new Mass in order to be reunited with the Catholic Church.(Lionel: An orthodox interpretation of Vatican Council II is to interpret the Council without the irrational premise.1)

According to a French media report published July 1, the SSPX has received a letter from Cdl. Gerhard Müller, then prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), reminding them that their reunion with the Catholic Church is based on the following conditions:

1. Adherence to the profession of faith written under Pope St. John Paul II in 1988( Lionel : Bradley means a profession of faith with the false premise. So the result is modernism)
2. Explicit acceptance of teachings from Vatican Council II and the post-conciliar period ( Bradley wants the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council with the false premise and so there is a rupture with Tradition 2)
3. Recognition of the validity and legitimacy of the New Rite of Mass and sacraments

​Cardinal Müller says these conditions were contained in the "Doctrinal Declaration" given to the SSPX last year during a meeting on June 13, 2016.(Lionel : He wanted the SSPX to interpret all magisterial documents with the false premise to create a rupture with the Creeds and Catechisms. ) He relates that these same conditions were presented by him with the "approval of the Sovereign Pontiff" to his congregation on May 10 and were approved at that time by a "unanimous decision of all members" of the CDF. He further notes the "Sovereign Pontiff approved these decisions" of the CDF on May 20.(Lionel: The CDF supports schism.) 3

By assuming there is known salvation outside the Church and possibilities known only to God are real people on earth saved outside the Churchthere are objective exceptions to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.So the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) has alleged objective exceptions. EENS is contradicted and made obsolete.

So by assuming there is known salvation outside the Church the past exclusivist ecclesiology is rejected. It is made obsolete.

By assuming there is known salvation outside the Church the ecumenism of return is rejected. Unitatitis Redintigratio 3 refers to known Christians saved outside the Church. The old ecumenism is rejected and now there is a new ecumenism.

By assuming there is known salvation outside the Church the Syllabus of Errors on exclusive salvation and an ecumenism of return is made obsolete.

By assuming there is known salvation outside the Church the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation becomes obsolete.

In this way Vatican Council II is also made a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).

But there is no known salvation outside the Church. So unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 2 etc cannot be objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.4

Cardinal Müller's five-year term as head of the CDF ended July 2. On June 27, however, while still in charge of the CDF, he sent a letter with the papally approved terms of reunion to Bp. Bernard Fellay, head of the SSPX. The cardinal's letter has subsequently been circulated to all members of the group.

The SSPX has rejected similar terms of reunification with Rome in 2012 and in 2016.(Lionel : The CDF will not interpret Vatican Council II rationally.They want to create a rupture with Tradition ) 5 It is speculated that the group will also reject these conditions. The SSPX claims Vatican Council II is full of doctrinal errors, and these errors are being universally perpetuated by all subsequent popes and the Magisterium.(Lionel: From Pope Paul VI to Pope Francis, Vatican Council II is being interpreted with an irrational premise instead of without it.So there have to be doctrinal errors and heresy.It is official) On its website FAQ, SSPX questions many doctrinal points of Vatican Council II, many teachings of all the popes since then and even the Catechism of the Catholic Church. (Lionel: The CDF and the SSPX have to make the invisible-visible, implicit-explicit distinction when interpreting Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Otherwise the confusion among them will continue. But for political reasons the CDF will not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and Bradley Eli wants the SSPX to also interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and to accept it, like Church Militant TV).

The SSPX even claims the Novus Ordo Mass is intrinsically evil, and no one should ever go to a Mass unless it's in the extraordinary form of the Latin Rite — and only then if it's offered by an SSPX priest. This recent video on the society's website clearly states their long-held position in this regard.

These conditions of accepting an orthodox understanding of Vatican Council II(Lionel: With the false premise, I repeat, there can be no orthodox interpretation of Vatican Council II.The CDF knows this and they are not talking about it in public.)  and the validity of the ordinary form of the Roman rite are not new. In March 2009, Pope Benedict XVI wrote a letter, explaining the SSPX separation is doctrinal(Lionel: Pope Benedict means that the SSPX has to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise as he does.The SSPX and Bradley Eli are not talking about this) in nature and not merely canonical or legal, as the SSPX would have the public believe.(Lionel: The SSPX will be accepted canonically and legally, like Church Militant TV, when they interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise to create a rupture with EENS, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.)

Benedict writes:

The fact that the Society of Saint Pius X does not possess a canonical status in the Church is not, in the end, based on disciplinary but on doctrinal reasons. (they have to interpret the Council with a false premise as Pope Benedict does)... In order to make this clear once again: Until the doctrinal questions are clarified,(Until they affirm Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and Creeds with the false premise to create a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed)  the society has no canonical status in the Church, and its ministers — even though they have been freed of the ecclesiastical penalty — do not legitimately exercise any ministry in the Church. ... In light of this situation, it is my intention henceforth to join the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei — the body which has been competent since 1988 for those communities and persons who, coming from the Society of Saint Pius X or from similar groups, wish to return to full communion with the Pope — to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. This will make it clear that the problems now to be addressed are essentially doctrinal in nature(they have to choose Vatican Council II(Cushingite) instead of Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) ) and concern primarily the acceptance of the Second Vatican Council( with irrational Cushingism) and the post-conciliar magisterium of the Popes(interpreted only with Cushingism).

The Holy Father continues:

The Church's teaching authority cannot be frozen in the year 1962 — this must be quite clear to the society.(Lionel: Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism; with the false premise instead of without it. Since then the Church is 'frozen' with a schism from the Left. It is official and accepted by the CDF and the present two popes)  But some of those who put themselves forward as great defenders of the council also need to be reminded that Vatican Council II embraces the entire doctrinal history of the Church.(Lionel: Vatican Council II with Cushingism does not embrace the entire doctrinal history of the Church. It is in schism on EENS with the popes before Pius XII ) Anyone who wishes to be obedient to the council has to accept the Faith professed over the centuries (Lionel: Over the centuries they were Feeneyite on EENS. They were Feeneyite on the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and beign saved in invincible ignorance(I.I). From Pope Paul VI the new faith is Cushingite on EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I .This is official heresy and schism. It is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc) and cannot sever the roots from which the tree draws its life.(Lionel: We have schism from the Left which is trying to appear magisterial. It is not magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake and violate the principle of non Contradiction.The Holy Spirit will suddenly not create a gap between faith and reason, as Cushingism does.Cushingism creates the hermeneutic of rupture and Pope Francis and Pope Benedict have accepted it.)- Lionel Andrades

1

Their false premise is:- 

1. Invisible people are visible.

2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.

3.The unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.

4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.

5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.

6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).

7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking  who are saved outside the Church.

8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.

9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.

10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.

2

So with the false premise there are objective exceptions to EENS etc:-

1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.

2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over the centuries referred  to only one known baptism, the baptism of water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.
3. The Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation outside the Church.Now  unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of salvation outside the Church.4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.

5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
6.With the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a hypothetical case only.
7.Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration  etc were all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/schism-from-left-created-with-false.html

3.

AUGUST 28, 2019

SCHISM FROM THE LEFT CREATED WITH A FALSE PREMISE

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/schism-from-left-created-with-false.html

AUGUST 28, 2019

We have a schism from the Left.It is silent, un-announced, seeping and creeping but there all the same

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/we-have-schism-from-leftit-is-silent-un.html

AUGUST 27, 2019

There is a schism in the Catholic Church today and it is from the Left and the liberals and the popes, cardinals and bishops must correct it

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/there-is-schism-in-catholic-church.html