We now know that Vatican Council II has no exceptions
for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
(EENS). So the drama of the Synods based upon Vatican Council II having
exceptions for EENS and being an alleged break with Tradition, has to end. It
can no more be said that the Council is a rupture with EENS and so this is a
precedent for innovation and liberalism. Polygamy and LGBT-sex can no more be
justified with Vatican Council II (Irrational). Neither are the 21 men, eligible
to be appointed cardinals this month, when they choose to interpret Vatican
Council II as having exceptions for EENS. The Council is no more ‘a new
revelation’ or ‘a revolution’ in the Church. A correction from Associated Press
and Reuters is long overdue.
Cardinals Hollerich, Grech and Marx must apologize for
giving us all their liberalism at the Synods, in the name of Vatican Council II.
Since now it is discovered that the Council has a continuity with the past
exclusivist ecclesiology. This is the Councilor Church. This is a Magisterial
Vatican Council II. This is the Catholic Church.
The moral theology and the new ecumenism are obsolete.Since they are based upon a fake Vatican Council II which is interpreted as
having practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. But Vatican Council II , we now know, is in
harmony with the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the Catechism of the Catholic
Church, interpreted rationally, i.e. having no exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
So the Taize ecumenism, planned for this month is
based upon a fake interpretation of Vatican Council II. There can only be an
ecumenism, founded on EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).Other
Christians must enter the Catholic Church and accept the Sacraments for
salvation. Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation ( AG7, LG 14, CCC
845,846 etc).
The ecumenism of the Bose Monastic community of Enzo Bianchi is a fake.Since it has no foundation in Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. There cannot be a Profession of Faith or a Renewal of Religious Vows, based upon obedience to superiors who follow a fake interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Even in a normal religious community, like the Missionaries of Charity of Mother Teresa or the Franciscans of the Immaculate, a religious sister cannot profess obedience to superiors, who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally with Cushingism i.e. they use the common false premise. Cushingism is heretical and schismatic. It is dishonest.
A religious vow is made before God. How can a religious pretend that Vatican Council II has exceptions for EENS and the Athanasius Creed? How can a religious ( like the cardinals and archbishops of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith(ex CDF), Vatican,) not affirm the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.
LG 8, 14, 15, and 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II always refer to hypothetical cases only. So how can they be practical exceptions for the dogma EENS and the Athanasius Creed? Yet religious sisters and brothers have to make vows of obedience based upon this wrong interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Why must they accept Sister Nathalie Bequart’s Synods based upon her fake interpretation of Vatican Council II?
Why must they be obedient to Pope Francis Amoris Laetitia and Traditionis Custode which are based upon a fake interpretation of Vatican Council II?
Why must they be obedient to Cardinal Matteo Zuppi’s support for homosexual unions, when his interpretation of Vatican Council II is factually and objectively wrong?
How can Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Cardinal Robert Sarah approve a Profession of Faith based upon error? The new Amazon Rite will also be offered with the heretical version of Vatican Council II?
A young vocation to the religious life has to accept homosexual unions and polygamy, to be in good standing in the Church - which means interpreting Vatican Council II only irrationally to condone all liberalism.
Pope Francis must now only interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc rationally and not irrationally and then theology and philosophy in the Church will be back on an even keel.
Catholics are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II like the popes from Paul VI to Francis, who have made a public mistake. They assumed that the Council mentioned exceptions for EENS and the Athanasius Creed. Common sense tells us that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc always refer to hypothetical cases. Invisible people in 2023 cannot be objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us humans. So there are no exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism, mentioned in Vatican Council II. - Lionel Andrades
Posts
