EWTN is not
considered a radical traditionalist Roman Catholic organisation since all their
apologists do not affirm the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus by interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.- Lionel Andrades
Lionel's blog
EWTN is not
considered a radical traditionalist Roman Catholic organisation since all their
apologists do not affirm the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus by interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.- Lionel Andrades
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke
is not announcing that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican
Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. They are not objective examples of
salvation outside the Church. So Vatican Council II does not contradict the
strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the
Athanasius Creed. The Council is not a break with the Syllabus of Errors and
the rest of Tradition.
Cardinal Burke avoids
being suspended by Pope Francis and the Left. It is the same with Bishop
Athanasius Schneider who told Dr. Taylor Marshall in an interview that there
are no literal cases of the baptism of desire and so mission was important.
Catholics are being misled when cardinals and bishops do not say that the
Council supports the 16th century EENS of the missionaries.-Lionel Andrades
The SSPX Superior General, bishops and priests want to
please the Jewish Left and the Vatican. They are looking after their careers,
reputation, status, property etc. So they are not rationally interpreting
Vatican Council II and are misleading the faithful. They are not announcing
that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are only hypothetical and
invisible cases in 2023.So these are not references to objective examples of
salvation outside the Catholic Church. They do not contradict the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the past ecclesiocentrism of
the Church. Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
The interpretation of Pope Paul VI and Archbishop
Marcel Lefebvre was irrational and wrong. We now have a rational and
traditional choice.
Also Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Lefebvre overlooked
the mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO). Invisible cases of
the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) could
not be visible exceptions for the dogma EENS.
The LOHO was irrational and heretical when it
suggested that not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation. It was
schism with the pre-1949 Magisterium.
The irrational interpretation of BOD and I.I and the
baptism of blood (BOB) and Vatican Council II (LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) by
the SSPX is political. They are misleading the Catholics. They are not telling
them the truth about Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades
I accept Vatican Council II as a legitimate Council. The Council
supports the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and
the rest of Tradition. I interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, as
being only hypothetical. They cannot be objective examples of salvation for us
humans in 2023.So Vatican Council Ii supports Tradition. It has the hermeneutic
of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechisms of Trent and Pius
X. The ecclesiology of the Church, before and after Vatican Council II is the same.
There is no new revelation or development of doctrine and dogma, when LG 8, LG
14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to speculative cases only.Speculative cases cannot be objective exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. They are not
practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed and the Great Commission.- Lionel Andrades
In his
latest video on the FBI Michael Voris is saying that he accepts Vatican Council
II interpreted irrationally as a legitimate Council and he wants the SSPX and the sedevacantists to do the same.
Michael is not telling us that the Council is legitimate only when it is
interpreted rationally. How can a Council interpreted irrationally be
Magisterial for Michael Voris? –
Lionel Andrades
We need red trad
cardinals. We need rad trad cardinals who interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,
NA 2, GS 22, rationally and so take the whole Church back to Tradition. One
simple action affects the whole Church. It is like watering the root of the
tree and the whole tree is nourished.- Lionel Andrades
Dom Alcuin
Reid in Frejuf Toulon, France, now under investigation by the Vatican could appeal to the French Ministry of
Education to please interpret LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in
Vatican Council II, rationally, in the schools, colleges and universities in
France.
The Nuncio
in Paris interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and so also the visiting
bishops sent by Pope Francis to the diocese of Bishop Dominique Rey. The Ecclesia Dei communities are not doing
anything about this.
Cardinal
Raymond Burke must interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 rationally. LG 8 etc must be seen as only hypothetical.
All the
cardinals must do the same.
The future
pope must interpret LG 8, 14, 16 etc as not being exceptions for Tradition.
The future
pope has to be conservative and traditional when he interprets LG 8 etc in
harmony with Tradition. The Church returns to its past ecclesiocentric
ecclesiology at every Mass in all Rites.- Lionel Andrades
The Ecclesia Dei communities in France must ask Bishop Dominique Rey, Archbishop Antoine Herouard and Bishop Joel Mercier to uphold the teachings of Vatican Council II, interpreted only rationally. The appeal must be made to all bishops including the liberals like Bishop Minnerath in Dijon.
They should demand that all the French cardinals and bishops must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so come back to Tradition.
Bishop Dominque Rey in Frejuf-Touloun France must only interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to hypothetical cases only. This is the rational and not common rational interpretation. There is no other rational choice.
Now Bishop Rey, the Ecclesia Dei communities, the liberals and the popes are interpreting LG 8 etc as referring to objective cases in 2023. They are physically visible people, it is reasoned wrongly. These are known people saved outside the Church it is reasoned irrationally.
This is the political interpretation of Vatican Council II thrust upon the Church by the Left. The Ecclesia Dei communities must choose the interpretation of the Council which is in harmony with Tradition.
Bishop Rey must admit that for him LG 8, LG 4, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are only theoretical and speculative cases. So he would expect the investigation which begins today by Archbishop Antoine Herouard and Bishop Joel Mercier to uphold the teachings of Vatican Council II, interpreted only rationally.
APOSTOLIC NUNCIO IN PARIS
Also the Apostolic Nunciature in France must also accept Vatican Council II. It would be unethical for the Nuncio to continue to interpret the Council irrationally.
Also the community of Alcuin Reid must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally. They is being honest and traditional. Dom Alcuin Rein is a monk of the Monastere Saint-benoit in the Diocese of Frejuf-Toulon.The community cannot be considered schismatic because they do not accept the Vatican Council II, irrational, as do the investigating bishops.
- Lionel Andrades
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/02/francis-intervenes-in-pro-traditional.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-ecclesia-dei-communities-in-france.html