Questo tempo particolare di preparazione sia tempo di preghiera, peniten...

There is an objective mistake in the New Theology of Pope Benedict and Maike Hickson is unaware of it

Maike  Hickson in her reports at Life Site News has not pointed out an important point - that Pope Benedict and Prof. Achim Buchanmaier use an irrational premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so a false rupture is created with extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the strict interpretation of St. Thomas Aquinas,St. Augustine , the popes and Church Fathers.

EVIDENCE 1

In two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Christianity and the World Religions(1997) and The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without Baptism (2007),1 Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr. Luiz Ladaria sj made a factual mistake.

They viewed Lumen Gentium 16  etc as being exceptions to the strict exclusivist interpretation of EENS. Maike Hickson does not refer to this error.Possibly she does not know about this.

EVIDENCE 2

Then in an interview with Avvenire, Pope Benedict further confirmed the error.2 He stated that EENS today was not the same as it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.There was 'a development' with Vatican Council II he said. He meant Vatican Council II was interpreted with LG 16 etc being exceptions to EENS.There was a hermeneutic of rupture for him.

EVIDENCE 3

The third proof of the error is the reference to The Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) in the ITC papers. Cardinal Ratzinger accepted the LOHO which was approved by Pope Pius XII. LOHO considered the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as being exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.So LOHO says that not every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation. This contradicts the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Error etc,which  state that there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and every one needs to be a member for salvation.

LOHO considered invisible cases of the BOD and I.I as being  visible exceptions to traditional EENS.3 This is irrational and heretical but it is the birth of the New Theology which Cardinal Ratzinger nurtured.

We now know that LOHO and Cardinal Ratzinger made an objective mistake.There are no known cases of being saved in BOD and I.I , without the Sacraments. If there were such cases it could only be known to God.So objectively for Cardinal Ratzinger there could be no BOD and I.I cases.

Similarly LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, do not refer to objective exceptions to EENS, for a discerning Catholic.So Vatican Council II interpreted rationally would not  contradict the strict interpretation of EENS, according to the Jesuit missionaries in the Middle East or the past Magisterium of the Church Fathers.

But LG 16 is an exception to EENS for Pope Benedict  and LG 8 is an exception to EENS for Cardinal Luiz Ladari( Placquet Deo Press Conference).4 They interpret LG 8 an LG 16 with a false premise.Unknown people are known, invisible people are visible, implicit and subjective cases are assumed to be explicit.

With the confusion between the speculative and practical they created the New Theology. It says outside the Church there is salvation.

This is also the New Theology of Achim Buchamauir, Cardinal Walter Kasper, Fr. Hans Kung  and the German cardinals and bishops.

It is only with a false premise, with a New Theology, that ' doctrines  develop' for Pope Benedict.

The false premise he uses is a factual error. It is a fact of life that we humans cannot see or meet any exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

So the New Theology is a fake theology approved by Pope Paul VI, Cardinal Ottaviani and Archbishop Lefebvre, which Pope Benedict has been officially promoting.

EVIDENCE 4

There is an empirical and objective mistake in the New Theology of Pope Benedict. He violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and Newton's Laws of Physics. 

For Pope Benedict a BOD and I.I case is known and visible on earth( to be an exception to EENS) and is also saved in Heaven at the same time.It is in two places.

In Newton's time , space and gravity, there are no 'solid state' human bodies  saved without the Sacrament in 1965-2020.They do not not exist.Yet the ITC papers and Pope Benedict's interpretation of LOHO and Vatican Council II show that he considers BOD and I.I and LG 16 as being real and known in personal cases, for them to be exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS.For him these are real cases and so this violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.If they were not real and visible people saved outside the Church for him, they could not be exceptions to EENS.This is a fundamental flaw in his philosophical reasoning .He confuses what is speculative as being practical and has carried the whole Church along with him, with this error, this infection.

The infection is there in the new books on Vatican Council II, articles on the New Ecclesiology and the New Ecumenism etc.

https://ratzinger-papst-benedikt-stiftung.de/stiftung/

EVIDENCE 5

Prof. Achim Bukenmaier of the Catholic Integrated Community(Integrierte Gemeinde ), which was supported by Pope Benedict when he was the Archbishop of Munich,is still a member of the Ratzinger Foundation. He also teaches the Ratzinger Studies and Spirituality at the Regina Apostolorum University Rome. He also has an office and staff at the John Lateran University, Rome where he promotes the irrational and heretical New Theology of Pope Benedict.

This point, about Pope Benedict's false New Theology is not covered by Maike Hickson. 

-Lionel Andrades

Feast of St. Francis Xavier.

1

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION

CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS
(1997)

PRELIMINARY NOTE

 

The study of the theme "Christianity and the World Religions" was adopted for study by a large majority of the members of the International Theological Commission. To prepare this study a subcommission was established composed of Bishop Norbert Strotmann Hoppe, M.S.C.; Rev. Barthelemy Adoukonou; Rev. Jean Corbon; Rev. Mario de Franca Miranda, S.J.; Rev. Ivan Golub; Rev. Tadahiko Iwashima, S.J.; Rev. Luis F. Ladaria, S.J. (president); Rev. Hermann J. Pottmeyer; and Rev. Andrzej Szostek, M.I.C. General discussion on this theme took place during several meetings of the subcommission and in the plenary sessions of the International Theological Commission held at Rome in 1993, 1994 and 1995. The present text was approved "in forma specifica" by vote of the commission on 30 September 1996 and was submitted to its president, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, who has given his approval for its publication.

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_1997_cristianesimo-religioni_en.html

 PRELIMINARY NOTE: The theme “The Hope of Salvation for Infants who Die Without Being Baptized” was placed under the study of the International Theological Commission. In order to prepare for this study, a Committee was formed comprised by Most Rev. Ignazio Sanna, Most Rev. Basil Kyu-Man Cho, Rev. Peter Damien Akpunonu, Rev. Adelbert Denaux, Rev. Gilles Emery, OP, Msgr. Ricardo Ferrara, Msgr. István Ivancsó, Msgr. Paul McPartlan, Rev. Dominic Veliath, SDB (President of the Committee), and Sr. Sarah Butler, MSTB. The Committee also received the collaboration of Rev. Luis Ladaria, SJ, the Secretary General of the International Theological Commission, and Msgr. Guido Pozzo, the Assistant to the ITC, as well as other members of the Commission. The general discussion on the theme took place during the plenary sessions of the ITC, held in Rome. In October 2005 and October 2006. This present text was approved in forma specifica by the members of the Commission, and was subsequently submitted to its President, Cardinal William Levada who, upon receiving the approval of the Holy father in an audience granted on January 19, 2007, approved the text for publication.

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_en.html

2

Pope Benedict Breaks Silence and Affirms the Thrice Defined, Infallible Dogma, No Salvation Outside of the Catholic Church

http://www.theeponymousflower.com/2016/03/pope-benedict-breaks-silence-and.html

3

Here is Christianity and the World Religions of the International Theological Commission which he approved along with Cardinal Ladaria in 1997. Notice how the theology is Cushingite.So there is a rupture with Tradition.Cushingism is responsible for his hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.

66. In his encyclical Mystici Corporis, Pius XII addresses the question, How are those who attain salvation outside visible communion with the Church related to her? He says that they are oriented to the mystical body of Christ by a yearning and desire of which they are not aware (DS 3821).( But this is a reference  by Pope Pius XII to hypothetical and invisible cases.This is something obvious.It is common sense.) The opposition of the American Jesuit Leonard Feeney, who insisted on the exclusivist interpretation of the expression extra ecclesiam nulla solus, afforded the occasion for the letter of the Holy Office, dated 8 August ,1949, to the archbishop of Boston, which rejected Feeney s interpretation and clarified the teaching of Pius XII. (So he means hypothetical cases are objective exceptions to Feeneyite EENS)  The letter distinguishes between the necessity of belonging to the Church for salvation (necessitas praecepti) and the necessity of the indispensable means of salvation (intrinseca necessitas); in relationship to the latter, the Church is a general help for salvation (DS 3867—69).(O.K,Hypothetically but what has this to do with EENS ? The Letter made an irrational inference too.)  In the case of invincible ignorance the implicit desire of belonging to the Church suffices; this desire will always be present when a man aspires to conform his will to that of God (DS 3870).(Again he is referring to an unknown person so what is this mentioned with reference to EENS? Why? Since his new theology is Cushingite.) But faith, in the sense of Hebrews 11:6, and love are always necessary with intrinsic necessity (DS 3872).

67. Vatican Council II makes its own the expression extra ecclesiam nulla salus. But in using it the council explicitly directs itself to Catholics and limits its validity to those who know the necessity of the Church for salvation.(Since he is a Cushingite he interprets Lumen Gentium 14 as referring to known people saved outside the Church and so there are known people saved in invincible ignorance.So only those who know and are not in ignorance need to enter the Church for him and not all non Catholics in general. This is one of the heights of Cushingism) The council holds that the affirmation is based on the necessity of faith and of baptism affirmed by Christ (LG 14). In this way the council aligned itself in continuity with the teaching of Pius XII,( The teaching of Pope Pius XII on EENS with known cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.Unknown cases are known exceptions. This is Cushingism again.) but emphasized more clearly the original parenthentical character of this expression.(Vaguely supporting Cushingism)

68. In contrast to Pius XII, the council refused to speak of a votum implicitum (implicit desire) and applied the concept of the votum only to the explicit desire of catechumens to belong to the Church (LG 14).(The catechumen who is saved with implicit or explicit desire is a hypothetical case. So why is it mentioned here ? Since it is not a hypothetical case for Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr. Luiz Ladaria s.j. They are Cushingites). With regard to non-Christians, it said that they are ordered in diverse ways to the people of God.(He does not say that they are all oriented to Hell. Since that would be the traditional Feeneyite theology with unknown cases not known exceptions to traditional EENS) In accord with the different ways with which the salvific will of God embraces non-Christians, the council distinguished four groups: first, Jews; second, Muslims; third, those who without fault are ignorant of the Gospel of Christ and do not know the Church but who search for God with a sincere heart and try to fulfill his will as known through conscience; fourth, those who without fault have not yet reached an express knowledge of God but who nonetheless try to lead a good life (LG 16). (Being a Cushingite he saying here that the exceptions are the ordinary means of salvation. He also contradicts the latter part of his Cushingite Redemptoris Missio).

Even ITC's The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptised is also presented with Cushingite theology.

58. In the face of new problems and situations and of an exclusive interpretation of the adage: (it was a dogma  defined by three Church Councils in the Extraordinary Magisterium and not an adage)“salus extra ecclesiam non est”, (it was always extra ecclesiam nulla salus) the magisterium, in recent times, has articulated a more nuanced understanding as to the manner in which a saving relationship with the Church can be realized.(He is referring to his Cushingite interpretation. His 'nuanced version' of course is not the traditional exclusivist understanding of salvation) The Allocution of Pope Pius IX, Singulari Quadam (1854) clearly states the issues involved: “It must, of course, be held as a matter of faith that outside the apostolic Roman Church no one can be saved, that the Church is the only ark of salvation, and that whoever does not enter it, will perish in the flood.(This is traditional Feeneyite theology which he will contradict in the next line by assuming unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to all needing to enter the Catholic Church for salvation) On the other hand, it must likewise be held as certain that those who live in ignorance of the true religion, if such ignorance be invincible, are not subject to any guilt in this matter before the eyes of the Lord” (In other words they are exceptions to EENS  for the ITC and so there is no more an exclusive interpretation.This is his familiar Cushingite theology) - 

THE HOPE OF SALVATION FOR INFANTS  WHO DIE WITHOUT BEING BAPTISED http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_en.html  

-Lionel Andrades

• International Theological Commission (50)
• Internatonal Theological Commission (5)

 MAY 17, 2018

The Council Fathers made the same objective errors in 1965 as did Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr.Luiz Ladaria s.j in the ITC theological papers

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-council-fathers-made-same-objective.html

4

• Placiut Deo (3)
• Placuet Deo (2)
• Placuet Deo and Bishop Robert Barron (2)
• Placuit Deo (38)

______________________

 DECEMBER 2, 2020

Maike Hickson does not mention that Prof. Achim Backenmaier, who teaches at the John Lateran and Regina Apostolorum University, Rome interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise.He uses the false New Theology of Pope Benedict based upon a false premise and inference. There is a flaw in the theology of Pope Benedict. This has to be recognised

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/maike-hickson-does-not-mention-that.html