Friday, June 10, 2022
Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell the truth to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
Pope John Paul
II and Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell the truth to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
Archbishop
Marcel Lefebvre was excommunicated in 1988.He died in 1991. Pope John Paul II
was the pope and Cardinal Ratzinger, the
Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF).Did they both
know that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with a Rational Premise and
the conclusion would be Traditional.
The archbishop
at least did not know. He was interpreting Vatican Council II with the
Irrational Premise, like Pope Paul VI.
INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION CHOSE THE FALSE PREMISE
The Irrational Premise (invisible non Catholics are visible) was used in the 1996 Christianity and the World Religions of the International Theological Commission, Vatican. The paper was published by Fr.Luiz Ladaria sj and was based upon the False Premise. If he knew about the error, he kept it a secret. He did not tell the bishops of the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) that they could interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms with the Rational Premise.It would have the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
The ITC paper was approved by Cardinal Ratzinger, as Prefect of the
CDF. He was not going to tell them. He wanted the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II
with the Irrational Premise. This was the doctrinal condition he set for the
SSPX,if they were serious about getting full canonical status.
Luiz Ladaria is now a cardinal and the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. This is the same post held by Cardinal Ratzinger when they issued Christianity and the World Religions, during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II.
Ladaria retires next month. He will still not announce that the SSPX and
the sedevacantists (CMRI etc.) could interpret Vatican Council II with the
Rational Premise. There will then no more be a theological break with the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. This is important for unity.
FR.JEAN MARIE GLIEZE OF THE SSPX STILL DOES NOT COMMENT
He said nothing.
He was appointed the leader of the Vatican team when doctrinal talks were held
with the SSPX during the pontificate of Pope Benedict. The SSPX was represented
by Fr.Jean Marie Glieze, a professor of Ecclesiology at the SSPX seminary in
Econe, Switzerland. I mentioned this issue on my blog. It was ignored.
They did not
discuss the error in Christianity and the World Religions. Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr.Luiz Ladaria sj
interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, by
confusing what is implicit as being being explicit, invisible as being visible.
Then they inferred that there were practical exceptions mentioned in Vatican
Council II for the Athanasius Creed which says all must be members of the
Catholic Church, for salvation from Hell.
BISHOP ATHANASIUS SCHNEIDER AND DR.TAYLOR MARSHALL CONTRADICT THE POPES
But there are no
literal cases of the baptism of desire said Bishop Athanasius Schneider when
interviewed by Dr.Taylor Marshall. There are no explicit cases of St.Thomas
Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire confirmed Taylor Marshall.They differed with Ratzinger and Ladaria.
Others, over the years have agreed. The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were not practical exceptions for the traditional interpretation of EENS said Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson, the former Nuncio to Switzerland and Liechtenstein. He is supported by Fr.Stefano Visintin OSB, the former Rector and Dean of Theology at the Benedictine University of St.Anselm, Rome. The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are “zero cases” in our reality said the American apologist John Martignoni.
But they were not “zero cases” for Pope Pius XII and the Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Richard Cushing. They did not correct the mistake in the secular media, against Fr.Leonard Feeney. Pope John XXIII and Pope John I also did not announce that BOD and I.I were “zero cases”. Fr.Leonard Feeney was still excommunicated for saying there were no visible cases of the baptism o of desire.
Everyone accepted the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO). Catholics professors were expelled by Boston College and Fr. Leonard Feeney was expelled from the Jesuit community. Everyone choose to confuse invisible cases as being visible.The LOHO used a False Premise and was referenced in Vatican Council II.
LOHO WITH THE MISTAKE WAS REFERENCED IN THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
The LOHO used the False Premise to interpret the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible ignorance (I.I) and was referenced in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, by Cardinal Ratzinger.
The BOD and I.I are speculative and unknown cases in the present times but they were projected as visible and objective people saved outside the Catholic Church and so a New Theology was created.The Church had moved from outside the Church there is no salvation to outside the Church there is known salvation.
So
the ITC paper does not refer to Catholicism and the World Religions but
Christianity and the World Religions. The LOHO-mistake was not corrected,
before it was placed in the Denzinger.It ended ecclesiocentrism in the Catholic Church.
CDF USES THE FALSE PREMISE IN THE DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS
Then on June 30, 2019 a Decree of Prohibitions was issued against the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The Archbishop-Secretaries, of the CDF, Di Noia and Morandi, interpreted the Catechism of the Catholic Church (847-848 on Invincible Ignorance), with the same False Premise.
Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior at the St. Benedict
Center, NH, was not told that he could interpret the Catechism of the Catholic
Church and Vatican Council II (LG 16) with the Rational Premise.Instead he was being punished for not using the False Premise. With the Rational Premise there would not be a break with Feeneyite EENS and the Athanasius Creed.
Cardinal Ladaria
could have been generous.He will retire in a few weeks. He will retire
without announcing that CCC 847-848 can be interpreted with the Rational Premise.
He is not announcing that the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846,
847, 848, and 1257) and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally will not
contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS, held by Brother Andre Marie
MICM, the Prior at the SBC.
SISTER MARIA PHILOMENA MICM DIRECTOR,SAI, INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY
There was no comment from the Vatican when on Twitter a few days back Sister Maria Philomena MICM, the Director of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom(SAI), at the St. Benedict Center, NH, contradicted the popes. She said at SAI they interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. So there was no break with the pre-1949 Magisterium. Over the centuries the popes and saints only used the Rational Premise. St.Thomas Aquinas knew that the man in the forest who was in invincible ignorance and would be saved, because God would send a preacher to him, referred always, to a hypothetical case, only.
No one saw a St.Emerentina in Heaven without the baptism of water.
We do not know of any person today, like Dismas the Good Thief who will be saved
outside the Church without the baptism of water. Since if there are
any such cases it would only be known to God. So it is wrong to project them as
practical exceptions for EENS.For us they are always hypothetical and never practical.
Did Cardinal
Luiz Ladaria know all this and keep it secret? Or is this a
discovery for him?
He did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
about it. This we know.
WHEN POPE FRANCIS USES THE FALSE PREMISE HE IS NOT MAGISTERIAL ON VATICAN COUNCIL II
But neither has
he told Pope Francis that interpreting Vatican Council II with a False Premise is not Magisterial ?. It was human error. The popes are only Magisterial on Vatican
Council II when they use the Rational Premise to interpret the text.
With the False Premise there is a break with the pre -1940 popes on de fide teachings and this is schism. It is also a rejection of the traditional interpretation of the Creeds. This is first class heresy according to Ad Tuendem Fidem of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.
There has been no denial from Andrea Tornelli and the Vatican Office
for Communications.-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 9, 2022
Pope Paul VI did not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and instead chose the Irrational Premise : thousands of priests and nuns gave up their religious vocation.
Pope Paul VI did not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and instead chose the Irrational Premise. The result was that thousands of priests and nuns gave up their religious vocation. The Council with the False Premise was projected as a break with Tradition.
THEY DID NOT TELL LEFEBVRE AND HE DID NOT KNOW
In the same line Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that he could interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise and there would not be a break with Tradition and the theology of the Roman Missal. He did not know that he was using a False and not Rational Premise. So a New Theology was created which said outside the Church there is known salvation.
It was with the New Theology based upon the False Premise that Archbishop Lefebvre wrongly interpreted Vatican Council II. He did not know about the False Premise and criticized Vatican Council II in general.
POPE BENEDICT STILL DOES NOT INFORM THE SSPX BISHOPS.IT IS A SECRET.
Until today Pope Benedict is not telling the SSPX bishops that they can affirm the Council with the Rational Premise and they could receive canonical recognition. Since they would be affirming Vatican Council II and Tradition.
In this context, Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are not Magisterial on Vatican Council II when they interpret the Council with the False and not Rational Premise. It is only when they choose the Rational Premise are they in harmony with the past Magisterium inspired by the Holy Spirit.
AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE CANNOT BE MAGISTERIAL
When they use the False Premise confusing what is invisible as being visible they contradict the past Magisterium. Also the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. This is human error which has come into the Church.
I interpret Magisterial Documents with the Rational Premise. All the cardinals and bishops can do the same. They can affirm the Council interpreted with the Rational Premise.
It was unfortunate that Archbishop Lefebvre was not informed about the Rational Premise.Did Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger not know about the False and Rational Premise ?
FR.LEONARD FEENEY CHOSE NOT TO USE THE FALSE PREMISE
Similarly Fr. Leonard Feeney was excommunicated because he did not use the False Premise to interpret the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible invincible ignorance(I.I). It is with the False interpretation of BOD and I.I that false practical exceptions are projected for the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Fr. Leonard Feeney was fortunate to have the excommunication lifted while he was still alive.He recited the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.It does not mention any exceptions.His funeral Mass was held in a church with a bishop present.
Pope Benedict may die while interpreting Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with a False Premise.He still supports schism with the past Magisteriumon on EENS, Athanasius Creed etc. This is first class heresy according to the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II, which he approved.The understanding of the Creeds is changed with the False Premise.Any pope who changes the interpretation of the Creeds is automatically excommunicated. It is a scandal.
It is the same for Pope Francis and many cardinals and bishops.
-Lionel Andrades
_______________________________
JUNE 5, 2022
There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II : Bishop Athanasius Schneider uses the Rational Premise to interpret Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism of desire) while Pope Francis , Popes Benedict and the cardinals and bishops use the Irrational Premise
JUNE 1, 2022
There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II : Bishop Athanasius Schneider uses the Rational Premise to interpret Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism of desire) while Pope Francis , Popes Benedict and the cardinals and bishops use the Irrational Premise
Posts
