St.Alphonsus Liguori says that if a priest is in mortal sin do not go up to receive the Eucharist from him - but what about a pope ?
Pope Francis has rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with alleged hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) being objective, seen in the flesh exceptions.This is irrational and non traditional.
The popes and saints in the past accepted BOD,BOB and I.I but did not interpret them as being exceptions.They obviously are not visible cases for them to be exceptions. They can only be speculative and theoretical for us human beings.
So St. Thomas Aquinas affirmed the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and BOD,BOB and I.I were not exceptions.He did not say that he personally knew the man in the forest living in ignorance. Instead he said that God would send a preacher to him since he was to be saved and he knew that this was a hypothetical case.
So St. Thomas Aquinas affirmed the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and BOD,BOB and I.I were not exceptions.He did not say that he personally knew the man in the forest living in ignorance. Instead he said that God would send a preacher to him since he was to be saved and he knew that this was a hypothetical case.
But they are not hypothetical cases, only, for Pope Francis.They are exceptions to EENS. He is not a Feeneyite.
When there are exceptions to EENS and he does not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, he implies that there are known and objective non Catholics saved outside the Church.This is irrational. Where are there such people on earth?
When there are exceptions to EENS and he does not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, he implies that there are known and objective non Catholics saved outside the Church.This is irrational. Where are there such people on earth?
This is also heresy. He has changed the traditional interpetation of the dogma EENS with this irrational innovation.
It is schism with the popes of the past. It is a sacrilege for him to offer Holy Mass in this condition of public mortal sin. Pope Francis needs absolution in the Confessional and then publically needs to remove the scandal.Then all will be well.
According to Canon Law a religious cannot hold office if he rejects the teachings of the Church which are obligatory to believe in.This would also apply to cardinals, bishops and the pope.
Since BOD,BOB and I.I are exceptions to the dogma EENS for Pope Francis he has changed the meaning of the Nicene Creed. This is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II. The pope is automatically excommunicated.
Since BOD,BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church the pope implies there is known salvation outside the Church and so all do not need to be members to avoid Hell. This contradicts the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation. Again this is heresy.It is a sin of faith.A Catholic Creed is being put aside by a pope.
Since BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS Pope Francis implies that the dogma EENS is now obsolete.However it also means that he interprets all the Catechisms( BOD, BOB and I.I) with the irrational premise to create a rupture with
the Syllabus of Errors(ecumenism of return), past ecclesiocentric exclusive ecclesiology and Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7) which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
This is a sacrilege.
So Pope Francis offers the Sacraments while being in a state of public sacrilege.
Catholics are expected to receive the Sacraments from him when he is in this state?.
I affirm Vatican Council II without the irrationality.BOD,BOB and I.I like LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc are only hypothetical. So Vatican Council II for me is not a rupture with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.But the pope does not affirm this rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.He wants a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was known to the Jesuit missionaries and the Magisterium in the 16th century.
I affirm Vatican Council II without the irrationality.BOD,BOB and I.I like LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc are only hypothetical. So Vatican Council II for me is not a rupture with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.But the pope does not affirm this rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.He wants a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was known to the Jesuit missionaries and the Magisterium in the 16th century.
A pope rejects Vatican Council II and then offers Holy Mass.Again this is heresy and sacrilege.Pope Francis wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II,interpreted with the irrational premise and inference to create a rupture with the de fide teachings of the Church.Now he will not affirm Vatican Council II, like me, in harmony with EENS, the past ecclesiology, the Athanasius Creed and the Catechism of Pope Pius X which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation( to avoid Hell).
How can he expect Catholics to come up for the Sacraments from him?
-Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 17, 2018
Canon Law must not only apply to Fr.Alessandro M.Minutella but also the bishops of Italy : Bishops of Palermo have committed a mortal sin of faith on EENS, Nicene Creed, Athansius Creed, Vatican Council II, Catechisms etc.Scandal must be ended in public before they administer the Sacraments and offer Holy Mass
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/11/canon-law-must-not-only-apply-to.html
NOVEMBER 18, 2018
They are receiving the Eucharist at Holy Mass from bishops in sacrilege
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/11/they-are-receiving-eucharist-at-holy.html
I always affirm the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invncible ignorance(Graphics)
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/i-always-affirm-baptism-of-desire.html
___________________________
___________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
___________________________
___________________________
AUGUST 10, 2018
The moment you say that BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS you infer that they refer to known people, visible people saved outside the Catholic Church : invisible people cannot be exceptions (Graphics)
-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 10, 2018
Chris Ferrara, Mons.Clifford Joseph Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Plinio CorrĂȘa de Oliveira, Michael Davis, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Attila Guimares, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari and others did not know about it
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/chris-ferrara-monsclifford-joseph.html
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
JULY 16, 2018
German bishops in big trouble (Graphics)
A (Feeneyite)
B (Cushingite)
B (Cushingite)
-Lionel Andrades
JULY 15, 2018
Back to the Basics (Graphics)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/back-to-basics-graphics.html
JULY 7, 2018
German bishops and Vatican hide a secret, tell a lie so stay legal . Unknown to media and judiciary -1
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-german-bishops-and-vatican-are.html
JULY 7, 2018
German bishops and Vatican hide a secret, tell a lie so stay legal . Unknown to media and judiciary -2
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/german-bishops-and-vatican-hide-secret.html
JULY 8, 2018
German bishops and Vatican hide a secret, tell a lie so stay legal . Unknown to media and judiciary -3 (Graphics)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/german-bishops-and-vatican-hide-secret_8.html
JULY 8, 2018
German bishops and Vatican hide a secret, tell a lie so stay legal . Unknown to media and judiciary - 4 (Graphics)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/german-bishops-and-vatican-hide-secret_10.html
JULY 6, 2018
What happens when Cardinal Marx knows...will he accept this reality, or will he go into schism?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/what-happens-when-cardinal-marx.html
JULY 6, 2018
Repost : It will be the liberals who will have to reject Vatican Council II. The German bishops will be in trouble. This will be unacceptable for them
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/reposts-it-will-be-liberals-who-will.html
JULY 6, 2018
Repost : Would the German bishops go into schism?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/repost-would-german-bishops-go-into.html
JULY 6, 2018
Repost : German Court would find the Knights of Malta and the Catholic bishops of Germany untruthful and telling a lie
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/repost-german-court-would-find-knights.html
JULY 6, 2018
Repost : German President must respect Catholic beliefs before and after Vatican Council II : outside the Church there is no salvationhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/repost-german-president-must-respect.html
JULY 6, 2018
Repost : Tell Card.Marx that you affirm Vatican Council II according to Lionel Andrades.There is no known salvation outside the Church. So Protestants cannot receive the Eucharist (Graphics)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/repost-tell-cardmarx-that-you-affirm.html
MAY 4, 2018
Theologically Cardinal Ladaria supports Cardinal Marx : Holy Communion for Protestants
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/repost-theologically-cardinal-ladaria.html
Reiterate
JULY 5, 2018
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/reiterate.html
JULY 5, 2018
These points should be clarified by the religious communities who are in communication with the CDF and Ecclesia Dei.Ask them if everyone can interpret Vatican Council II and EENS as does the blogger on Lionel's Blog.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/these-points-should-be-clarified-by.htm
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
NOVEMBER 3, 2018
The Catholic politicians in Italy can affirm all the teachings of the Catholic Church without an irrational premise and inference : their conclusion would be different from the Left.
The Catholic politicians in Italy can affirm all the teachings of the Catholic Church. They can affirm the Creed like me and also Vatican Council II. They can interpret all the Catechisms in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation.
But like me and unlike the two popes and all the cardinal and bishops, they will not use an irrational premise ( invisible people are visible) and inference( invisible non Catholics saved outside the Church are visible examples of salvation outside the Church and exceptions to EENS).
So there is no non traditional conclusion which says outside the Church there is known salvation and so Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
So like me, their interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechisms will differ from the Left. It would be completely different.
They would be in harmony with the founders of religious communities like St.Francis of Assisi. Now the Left creates a rupture with St. Francis' understanding of exclusive salvation and doctrines related to it.
These Catholic politicians, who would be affirming Tradition with exclusive salvation along with Vatican Council II, would be opposed within the Church by many cardinals and bishops. Even the secular leftist authorities , who support abortion and homosexuality, could oppose them.
But the ordinary Catholic would know that these politicians are rational, traditional and honest, while the Catholic Left is deceptive.
Catholics who attend Mass in italian or Latin would then have a clear Catholic Identity. There would also be the need for traditional Mission with Vatican Council II saying all non Catholics need faith and baptism for salvation. They need to enter the Catholic Church with Catholic faith and the baptism of water to avoid Hell.
However these Catholic politicians must be aware that Archbishop Lefebvre and Pope Pius XII also interpreted the dogma EENS like the Left does today. They make the same mistake as the liberals whom they otherwise criticize. So the theology and doctrines on salvation of the Lefbvrists must be avoided.
I do not interpret Vatican Council II and EENS like them.Neither do I interpret the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance like them.So our conclusions are different. Mine is traditional and thiers is a rupture with Tradition.-Lionel Andrades