-Lionel Andrades
Friday, February 7, 2020
Books of Pope Francis and Pope Benedict technically should not receive permission to be pubished by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' Conference(USCCB) Doctrinal Committee, since they are written with a false premise,inference and conclusion.
Books of Pope Francis and Pope Benedict technically should not receive permission to be pubished by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' Conference(USCCB) Doctrinal Committee, since they are written with a false premise,inference and conclusion.Theologically they do not qualify as being Catholic.
The popes also use the false premise, inference to interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I).What is invisible is considered visible.Unknown cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are confused as known people in the present times.So they have changed the understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed( See right hand bar for details).The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is obsolete for them.
With the same irrational premise, inference and conclusion they interpret all the Catechisms including the Cathechism of the Catholic Church(1994).
The cardinals and bishops make the same mistake as the popes.Their Cushingite mistake has spread throughout the Church.
I interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms and EENS with Feeneyism. I avoid the false premise, inference and conclusion. I use the rational premise and inference to reach the traditional conclusion.There is no rupture with the past.
But for the USCCB outside the Church there is known salvation. It is the same for the EWTN and the National Catholic Register.They follow Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and conclude that their is a New Theology created in the Church with the irrational model.1
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the President of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee uses this irrational model to interpret the Council, the Creeds, Catechisms, EENS and BOD,BOB and I.I. So he would grant the imprimatur for books with the error.-Lionel Andrades
1
IRRATIONAL MODEL
_________________________________________________
FEBRUARY 6, 2020
Pope Francis should not expect Catholics to take him seriously since his credibility drops, like that of Pope Benedict, when they use a false premise,inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II and so avoid the rational alternative. .They need to issue a correction.
FEBRUARY 6, 2020
Pope Francis' books also follow this model : They interpret the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion.
FEBRUARY 6, 2020
All the USCCB-approved books on Vatican Council II are based upon this model
FEBRUARY 5, 2020
Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false, premise and conclusion and this shows up in his encyclicals, exhortations and bulls published in books,which violate the Principle of Non Contradiction.Also Pope Benedict does not use a rational premise and inference to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Tradition(Syllabus of Errors,past ecclesiology, 16th century ecumenism and Feeneyite EENS) : two papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican should be withdrawn
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/pope-francis-interprets-vatican-council.html
FEBRUARY 4, 2020
Pope Francis' encyclicals, bulls and exhortations refer to Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. It was the same for Pope Benedict in all his books.It is time to simplify the Church.They could issue a statement and agree with me.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/pope-francis-encyclicals-bulls-and.html
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
FEBRUARY 3, 2020
The Southern Poverty Law Center, Associated Press, Reuters and the rest of the Left accuse traditionalists of not accepting 'the reforms of Vatican Council II'. They mean Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, inference and conclusion. They do not refer to Vatican Council II interpreted with a rational premise and inference creating a traditional conclusion. So this is false information on the Council from them.A correction and a clarification is needed. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-southern-poverty-law-center.html
JANUARY 26, 2020
Cardinal Reinhardt Marx needs to review the books on Vatican Council II in Germany. They have a built-in error.New books need to be written on the Council
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/cardinal-reinhardt-marx-needs-to-review.html
JANUARY 28, 2020
The publishers of Pope Benedict's books in German must note that he used a false premise and inference to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and this is not only bad philosophy and bad theology it is unethical and dishonest.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-publishers-of-pope-benedicts-books.html
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops(USCCB) and Joe Biden, a Democrat Catholic Presidential candidate for the USA elections next year interprets Vatican Council II deceptively and heretically and this is being overlooked by the Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committe Bishop Kevin Rhoades
OCTOBER 12, 2019
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops(USCCB) and Joe Biden, a Democrat Catholic Presidential candidate for the USA elections next year interprets Vatican Council II deceptively and heretically and this is being overlooked by the Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committe Bishop Kevin Rhoades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-united-states-conference-of.html
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
SEPTEMBER 24, 2018
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committe has made a doctrinal mistake (Graphics)
-Lionel Andrades
_______________________________________-
-Lionel Andrades
_______________________________________-
SEPTEMBER 23, 2018
Things are so bad on doctrine and theology in the Catholic Church that the new Chairman of the Unites States Catholic Conference of Bishops(USCCB) cannot deny what I have written.
Things are so bad on doctrine and theology in the Catholic Church that the new Chairman of the Unites States Catholic Conference of Bishops(USCCB) cannot deny what I have written.1
He will not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
He agrees with me?!
1.Practically there are no known people saved outside the Catholic Church with the baptism of desire(bod), baptism of blood(BOB) and in invincible ignorance(I.I). The Holy Office 1949 made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.
2.Common sense tells us that BOD, BOB and I.I are not physically visible cases and neither did the popes and saints over the centuries claim that they are.
3.In general people will agree that BOD,BOB and I.I refer to hypothetical cases only.
There is no denial also from Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee regarding the error he made in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
In his radio program this month he mentions 'elements of sanctification and truth'(Lumen Gentium 8) as if it is an example of known salvation outside the Church and so an exception to the dogma EENS.This is irrational.It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction. How can we see people saved on earth ? How can they be in two places at the same time?
How can his new theology say outside the Church there is salvation.Where is this salvation?
Things are so bad on doctrine and theology in the Catholic Church that the new Chairman of the Unites States Catholic Conference of Bishops(USCCB) cannot deny what I have written.1
He will not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
He agrees with me?!
1.Practically there are no known people saved outside the Catholic Church with the baptism of desire(bod), baptism of blood(BOB) and in invincible ignorance(I.I). The Holy Office 1949 made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.
2.Common sense tells us that BOD, BOB and I.I are not physically visible cases and neither did the popes and saints over the centuries claim that they are.
3.In general people will agree that BOD,BOB and I.I refer to hypothetical cases only.
There is no denial also from Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee regarding the error he made in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
In his radio program this month he mentions 'elements of sanctification and truth'(Lumen Gentium 8) as if it is an example of known salvation outside the Church and so an exception to the dogma EENS.This is irrational.It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction. How can we see people saved on earth ? How can they be in two places at the same time?
How can his new theology say outside the Church there is salvation.Where is this salvation?
How can his new theology say outside the Church there is salvation.Where is this salvation?
1.Practically there are no known people saved outside the Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth'.So the Council Fathers at Vatican Council II picked up the error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
2.The text of Lumen Gentium 8 does not state that there are physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church.So a wrong inference is made by Bishop Rhoades.
3.Common sense tells us it is a reference to a hypothetical case. It is speculation with good will.
So it was wrong for Bishop Kevin Rhoades to interpret Vatican Council II (LG 8 etc) as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
There is no denial from the USCCB or Bishop Rhoades. No one wants to correct me.
So they know that I am correct and they do not want to say anything.-Lionel Andrades
1
1
SEPTEMBER 22, 2018
LUMEN GENTIUM 8 AND BOD,BOB AND I.I ARE HYPOTHETICAL AND THEORETICAL AND ARE NOT EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EENS. YET FOR BISHOP KEVEN RHOADES THEY ARE EXCEPTIONS.THIS IS A BIG MISTAKE OF THE USCCB DOCTRINAL COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN
HTTP://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.COM/2018/09/SO-LUMEN-GENTIUM-8-AND-BODBOB-AND-II.HTML
HTTP://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.COM/2018/09/SO-LUMEN-GENTIUM-8-AND-BODBOB-AND-II.HTML
SEPTEMBER 22, 2018
Lumen Gentium 8 and BOD,BOB and I.I are hypothetical and theoretical and are not exceptions to the dogma EENS. Yet for Bishop Keven Rhoades they are exceptions.This is a big mistake of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee Chairman
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee makes an error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
In his recent radio program he cites Lumen Gentium 8, 'elements of sanctification and truth', as if it is an example of known salvation outside the Church and so an exception to the dogma EENS.
This is irrational.
1.Practically there are no known people saved outside the Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth'.
2.The text of Lumen Gentium 8 does not state that there are physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church.
3.Common sense tells us it is a reference to a hypothetical case. It is speculation with good will, something hoped for.
Neither is Nostra Aetate an exception to the dogma no salvation outside the Church.
MISTAKE ON EENS TOO
Similarly he will not affirm EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
He made a mistake again.
1.Practically there are no known people saved outside the Catholic Church with the baptism of desire(bod), baptism of blood(BOB) and in invincible ignorance(I.I). We cannot see or meet any one saved as such in 2018 or over the last 100 years.The Holy Office 1949 made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.
2.Common sense tells us that BOD, BOB and I.I are not physically visible cases and neither do the popes and saints claim they are.The Catechism of Pope Pius X mentions being saved in invincible ignorance and does not state that it refers to someone known. Similtaneously this Catechism says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and it does not mention any exceptions.
3.In general people will say that BOD,BOB and I.I refer to hypothetical cases.
So Lumen Gentium 8 and BOD,BOB and I.I are hypothetical and theoretical and are not exceptions to the dogma EENS.
Yet for Bishop Keven Rhoades they are exceptions.This is a big mistake.
-Lionel Andrades
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee makes an error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
In his recent radio program he cites Lumen Gentium 8, 'elements of sanctification and truth', as if it is an example of known salvation outside the Church and so an exception to the dogma EENS.
This is irrational.
Neither is Nostra Aetate an exception to the dogma no salvation outside the Church.
MISTAKE ON EENS TOO
Similarly he will not affirm EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
He made a mistake again.
1.Practically there are no known people saved outside the Catholic Church with the baptism of desire(bod), baptism of blood(BOB) and in invincible ignorance(I.I). We cannot see or meet any one saved as such in 2018 or over the last 100 years.The Holy Office 1949 made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.
2.Common sense tells us that BOD, BOB and I.I are not physically visible cases and neither do the popes and saints claim they are.The Catechism of Pope Pius X mentions being saved in invincible ignorance and does not state that it refers to someone known. Similtaneously this Catechism says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and it does not mention any exceptions.
3.In general people will say that BOD,BOB and I.I refer to hypothetical cases.
So Lumen Gentium 8 and BOD,BOB and I.I are hypothetical and theoretical and are not exceptions to the dogma EENS.
Yet for Bishop Keven Rhoades they are exceptions.This is a big mistake.
-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 22, 2018
Vatican Council II supports traditional EENS and Bishop Kevin Rhoades, like Cardinal Donald Wuerl and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, cannot say it http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/vatican-council-ii-supports-traditional.html
SEPTEMBER 21, 2018
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee in his radio program makes the same doctrinal error as Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj at the Placuet Deo Press Conference http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/bishop-kevin-rhoades-new-chairman-of.html
SEPTEMBER 21, 2018
When Bishop Kevin Rhoades infers that Lumen Gentium and Nostra Aetate say we know of non Catholics saved outside the Church it is irrational and heretical: Vatican Council II does not contradict traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/when-bishop-kevin-rhoades-infers-that.html
Bishop who interprets Vatican Council II and outside the Church with no salvation with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism is the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/bishop-who-interprets-vatican-council.html
SEPTEMBER 16, 2018
Cardinal Donald Wuerl and the USCCB Doctrinal Committee, chaired by Archbishop William E.Lori, made an objective error in the Notification on Fr. Peter C.Phan http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/cardinal-donald-wuerl-and-usccb.html
SEPTEMBER 14, 2018
Vatican Council II says extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/vatican-council-ii-says-extra-ecclesiam.html
_____________________________________
Bishop Rhoades, like his predecessor Donald Wuerl as the Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee is maintaining the duplicity on Vatican Council II and no one is complaining.
Lumen Gentium 8, 'elements of sanctification and truth' in other religions does not refer to known people saved outside the Catholic Church. It is not an example of salvation outside the Church.
1.Practically there are no known people saved outside the Church with elements of sanctification and truth.
2.The text of Lumen Gentium 8 does not state that there physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church.
3.Common sense tells us it is a reference to a hypothetical case. It is speculation with good will, something hoped for.
Neither is Nostra Aetate an exception to o salvation outside the Church. 
We can respect non Catholics, we can treat them with dignity we can even serve them in love as Jesus wants us to do so but in charity we must tell them the truth i.e Nostra Aetate no where contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
Literally we cannot know of any exception to EENS. The text of Nostra Aetate does not state that there are practically known exceptions to EENS.
Nostra Aetate 2 refers to a hyopthetical case when it refers to ' a ray of that Truth which enlightens'. This is an abstract reference.
A theoretical possibility, a hope of someone being saved outside the Church is not an actual and known case. So it cannot be an objective example of salvation outside the Church.
It is the same with Lumen Gentium and Ad Gentes, they do not contradict the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century.
Vatican Council II supports traditional EENS and Bishop Kevin Rhoades, like Cardinal Donald Wuerl and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, cannot say it.-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 21, 2018
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee in his radio program makes the same doctrinal error as Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj at the Placuet Deo Press Conference http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/bishop-kevin-rhoades-new-chairman-of.html
SEPTEMBER 21, 2018
When Bishop Kevin Rhoades infers that Lumen Gentium and Nostra Aetate say we know of non Catholics saved outside the Church it is irrational and heretical: Vatican Council II does not contradict traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/when-bishop-kevin-rhoades-infers-that.html
SEPTEMBER 21, 2018
When Bishop Kevin Rhoades infers that Lumen Gentium and Nostra Aetate say we know of non Catholics saved outside the Church it is irrational and heretical: Vatican Council II does not contradict traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/when-bishop-kevin-rhoades-infers-that.html
http://connecticutcatholiccorner.blogspot.com/2018/07/how-can-dogma-change.html#disqus_thread
Vatican Council II supports traditional EENS and Bishop Kevin Rhoades, like Cardinal Donald Wuerl and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, cannot say it http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/vatican-council-ii-supports-traditional.html
SEPTEMBER 21, 2018
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee in his radio program makes the same doctrinal error as Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj at the Placuet Deo Press Conference http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/bishop-kevin-rhoades-new-chairman-of.html
SEPTEMBER 21, 2018
When Bishop Kevin Rhoades infers that Lumen Gentium and Nostra Aetate say we know of non Catholics saved outside the Church it is irrational and heretical: Vatican Council II does not contradict traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/when-bishop-kevin-rhoades-infers-that.html
Bishop who interprets Vatican Council II and outside the Church with no salvation with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism is the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/bishop-who-interprets-vatican-council.html
SEPTEMBER 16, 2018
Cardinal Donald Wuerl and the USCCB Doctrinal Committee, chaired by Archbishop William E.Lori, made an objective error in the Notification on Fr. Peter C.Phan http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/cardinal-donald-wuerl-and-usccb.html
SEPTEMBER 14, 2018
Vatican Council II says extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/vatican-council-ii-says-extra-ecclesiam.html
_____________________________________
Bishop Rhoades, like his predecessor Donald Wuerl as the Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee is maintaining the duplicity on Vatican Council II and no one is complaining.
Lumen Gentium 8, 'elements of sanctification and truth' in other religions does not refer to known people saved outside the Catholic Church. It is not an example of salvation outside the Church.
1.Practically there are no known people saved outside the Church with elements of sanctification and truth.
2.The text of Lumen Gentium 8 does not state that there physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church.
3.Common sense tells us it is a reference to a hypothetical case. It is speculation with good will, something hoped for.
Neither is Nostra Aetate an exception to o salvation outside the Church.
We can respect non Catholics, we can treat them with dignity we can even serve them in love as Jesus wants us to do so but in charity we must tell them the truth i.e Nostra Aetate no where contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
Literally we cannot know of any exception to EENS. The text of Nostra Aetate does not state that there are practically known exceptions to EENS.
Nostra Aetate 2 refers to a hyopthetical case when it refers to ' a ray of that Truth which enlightens'. This is an abstract reference.
A theoretical possibility, a hope of someone being saved outside the Church is not an actual and known case. So it cannot be an objective example of salvation outside the Church.
It is the same with Lumen Gentium and Ad Gentes, they do not contradict the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century.
Vatican Council II supports traditional EENS and Bishop Kevin Rhoades, like Cardinal Donald Wuerl and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, cannot say it.-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 21, 2018
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee in his radio program makes the same doctrinal error as Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj at the Placuet Deo Press Conference http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/bishop-kevin-rhoades-new-chairman-of.html
SEPTEMBER 21, 2018
When Bishop Kevin Rhoades infers that Lumen Gentium and Nostra Aetate say we know of non Catholics saved outside the Church it is irrational and heretical: Vatican Council II does not contradict traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/when-bishop-kevin-rhoades-infers-that.html
SEPTEMBER 21, 2018
When Bishop Kevin Rhoades infers that Lumen Gentium and Nostra Aetate say we know of non Catholics saved outside the Church it is irrational and heretical: Vatican Council II does not contradict traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/when-bishop-kevin-rhoades-infers-that.html
http://connecticutcatholiccorner.blogspot.com/2018/07/how-can-dogma-change.html#disqus_thread
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
