Tuesday, December 28, 2021
Traditionis Custode supports a Vatican Council II interpreted with a False Premise. How can it be legal in a canonical or secular sense? The Magisterium cannot make an objective mistake upon which it builds a false liberalism. : Pope Francis must correct the error
Traditionis Custode cannot be
canonically legal when it interprets Vatican Council II with a False Premise( what is invisible is considered visible) which is unethical, dishonest and not Magisterial. Its conclusion is schism
with the past Magisterium.While I can interpret Vatican Council II with the
Rational Premise(what is invisible is considered invisible) and there is no break with the past Magisterium and there is
the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. Pope Francis must correct the error.
He could announce that all Parish Priests and Rectors should only interpret
Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise (LG 8,14 and 16 refer to invisible cases in 2021) and the Latin Mass ( and Novus
Ordo Mass) should be permitted by bishops for those who accept Vatican Council
II and interpret it only with a Rational Premise( invisible cases of LG 16 etc are not not visible) and Rational Inference ( LG 16 etc are not practical exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus) and Traditional Conclusion( Vatican Council II is in harmony with EENS with no known exceptions.The past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology is intact.We have traditional mission, ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue).
IF IT IS NOT INSPIRED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT
HOW CAN IT BE CATHOLIC AND BINDING?
When the action and conclusion are not magisterial
then it cannot be Catholic. When it is unethical, dishonest and non Magisterial
it cannot be binding on Catholics even if it is approved by the present two
popes.
THE FOUR MARKS OF THE CHURCH (NICENE
CREED) INTERPRETED WITH A FALSE PREMISE?
How can the Holy Spirit want Catholics to interpret the Creeds, Catechisms, dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance), Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Oath Against Modernism, Oath of Office of a Bishop, the Four Marks of the Church ( Nicene Creed) and Vatican Council II with a False Premise ?
It would mean that at the Eucharist, at
Holy Mass, there are believers who reject Tradition and those who accept it, some use a False Premise and others avoid it, so
there are two interpretations of Magisterial Documents, two sets of doctrine
and theology.
In Civitavecchia and Lazio, Italy all the religious communities have to interpret Vatican Council II with a False Premise to be canonically legal ?
Why does Cardinal Braz de Avez want the
Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate, to interpret Vatican Council II with a
Fake Premise.
Everybody has to interpret Vatican
Council II with a Fake Premise to be politically correct with the Left.
The Comitato dell Immaculata permits the
bishops in the parish-church Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti, Boccea, Rome,
to interpet Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise instead of the Rational
Premise, which would be Magisterial and also rational.
ITALIAN BISHOPS USE THE FAKE PREMISE AS
THE NOVUS ORDO MASS
Bishop Gianluca Ruzza and Emiritus Bishop Gino Reali in the diocese of Porto Santa Rufina, Rome, interpret Vatican Council II and Magisterial Documents with a Fake Premise, at the Novus Ordo Mass in Italian. How can this be legal in a canonical or secular sense?
They are morally obliged to inform
Christian non Christian organizations to interpret Vatican Council II with the
Rational Premise.
I repeat, Pope Francis must correct the error. He could announce that all Parish Priests and Rectors should only interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and the Latin Mass ( and Novus Ordo Mass) should be permitted by bishops for those who accept Vatican Council II and interpret it only with a Rational Premise.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
