If we go back to the interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney then pastorally Vatican Council II will have the hermeneutic of continuity.If all of them would accept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney then Vatican Council II would pastorally be in harmony with Tradition.
Yes we've finally found the missing link.
What causes the hermeneutic of rupture ?
When has Vatican Council II a hermeneutic of continuity?
The whole Church rejects Feeneyism and so Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition.Here is the where the error lies.
This is a doctrinal issue for the Franciscans of the Immaculate (F.I). The F.I Commissioner Fr. Sabino Ardito,sdb and Cardinal Braz de Avez interpret Vatican Council II unaware of the missing link.
So if the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate priests, who offer only the Traditional Latin Mass, affirm LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc as being invisible for us, there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the old ecclesiology.
There would be nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the Feeneyite version of EENS.
So they would be affirming Vatican Council II ( as sought by the Commissar) and also the ecclesiology of the 16th century missionaries.
It's as simple as that!
Will they permit all the priests of the F.I to interpret Vatican Council II with LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc as being invisible and not visible,hypothetical and not concrete, unknown to us and known only to God ?
Presently the Commissioner of the F.I supports doctrinal ambiguity in the community.He uses a falsehood to interpret Vatican Council II.This makes the Council a break with the past.This is acceptable for Pope Francis.
The Commissioner is not asking the two popes to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and acknowledge that there is a mistake in the text of the Council.
The missing link is the irrational inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Get rid of the inference and as in a snap of the finger the Council becomes traditional, as it always was.
Without the irrational inference, Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of continuity. With the false premise of being able to see the dead-saved,with the baptism of desire etc, the Council has the hermeneutic of rupture.We have finally found the ‘missing link’ for either of the two heremeneutics.It is so simple.
Feeneyism is the missing link
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/feeneyism-is-missing-link.html
MAY 13, 2016
Factual mistakes in Vatican Council II are not noted on the SSPX website
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/05/factual-mistakes-in-vatican-council-ii.html
When will Fr. Sabino Ardito SDB make an announcement on the Franciscans of the Immaculate doctrinal issue ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/when-will-fr-sabino-ardito-sdb-make.html
MARCH 8, 2015
NOVEMBER 12, 2014
Cardinal Raymond Burke and Fr.Nicholas Gruner affirm the same error as do the liberals
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/cardinal-raymond-burke-and-frnicholas.html
Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake with the Letter of the Holy Office and carried it over into Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/archbishop-lefebvre-made-mistake-with.html
JUNE 13, 2014
Roman Forum Summer Conference this month will use the right hand side column in the interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/roman-forum-summer-conference-this.html
The 'missing link' discovered : what makes Vatican Council II traditional or heretical
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/the-missing-link-discovered-what-makes.html
_____________________________________________________________
Cardinal Ratzinger did not know that with Feeneyism Vatican Council II does not have a hermeneutic of rupture ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/cardinal-ratzinger-did-not-know-that.html
With Feeneyite Vatican Council II the Catholic Church affirms the Social Reign of Christ the King.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/with-feeneyite-vatican-council-ii.html
Feeneyite Vatican Council II says Lutherans are on the way to Hell.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/feeneyite-vatican-council-ii-says.html
Feeneyism is the missing link
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/feeneyism-is-missing-link.html
If all of them would accept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney then Vatican Council II would pastorally be in harmony with Tradition
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/if-all-of-them-would-accept-dogma-extra.html
If we go back to the interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney then pastorally Vatican Council II will have the hermeneutic of continuity
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/if-we-go-back-to-interpretation-of.html
Do you see the mistake made by Archbishop Augustine di Noia in the text ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/do-you-see-mistake-made-by-archbishop.html
I know what I am saying will be new for you.It will be new for most Catholics
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/i-know-what-i-am-saying-will-be-new-for.html
If they would believe Cardinal Cushing and not Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes : Cardinal Burke, Bishop Athanasius Schneider
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/if-they-believe-that-cardinal-cushing.html
Until Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider affirm Feeneyism as a salvation theology they will not be able to interpret Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity.Vatican Council II will continue to be a rupture with Tradition
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/until-cardinal-burke-and-bishop.html
The difference between me and others is that I interpret Vatican Council II at face-value, according to the text,while the others interpret the text with an inference.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/the-difference-between-me-and-others-is.html
This is the irrationality of the present magisterium and it is supported by the two popes.So Church Militant TV has to do the same.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/this-is-irrationality-of-present.html
So if Cardinal Burke can accept the innovation and reject the past magisterium and support the present magisterium, Catholics could then ask why cannot they also abort, since one does not have to follow the moral teachings of only the Catholic Church to go to Heaven?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/so-if-cardinal-burke-can-accept.html
On Mission Sunday Pope Francis promoted the Masonic Christology approved also by Pope Benedict
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/on-mission-sunday-pope-francis-promoted.html
Pope Francis affirms 'the absoluteness and uniqueness' of Jesus which is common for him in the Lutheran and Pentecostal communities too : not necessary to convert
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/pope-francis-affirms-absoluteness-and.html
Mission Sunday is being celebrated today without the traditional Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/mission-sunday-is-being-celebrated.html
Atila S. Guimarães and Robert de Mattei wrote books on Vatican Council II while assuming imaginary and hypothetical cases were objectively visible
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/atila-s-guimaraes-and-robert-de-mattei.html
Atila S. Guimarães was ignorant of all this when he wrote his book
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/atila-s-guimaraes-was-ignorant-of-all.html
Atila S. Guimarães made a mistake in the interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus : with the same irrational reasoning Vatican Council II emerges as a break with Tradition for him
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/atila-s-guimaraes-made-mistake-in.html
Why is Vatican Council II not fundamentalist for La Stampa?Archbishop Guido Pozzo does not state that Vatican Council II is fundamentalist.Even Catholic conservatives, traditionalists and La Stampa journalists are not aware that Vatican Council II in itself is fundamentalist
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/why-is-vatican-council-ii-not.html
Vatican Council II is fundamentalist if you stay clear of the Kasper-Lefebvre theology.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/vatican-council-ii-is-fundamentalist-if.html
LUTHERANS ARE ON THE WAY TO HELL ACCORDING TO VATICAN COUNCIL II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/lutherans-are-on-way-to-hell-according.html
Mundabor is still having a problem with Vatican Council (Cushingism) and is not aware of an alternative interpretation
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/mundabor-is-still-having-problem-with.html
I am calling attention to the irrational theology.One can continue to accept all the teachings of the Church, all the dogmas, without using the irrational theology. Change the theology and you change Vatican Council II, change the theology and you change the Church, you take it back to its rational and traditional teachings.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/i-am-calling-attention-to-irrational.html