Poor scholarship at PISAI

The Pontifical Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies in Rome interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise, inference and conclusion to create a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church and the work of the Missionaries of Africa in Tunisia in 1926 when PISAI was founded.

So there is poor scholarship at PISAI.

 

 

At PISAI they could choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, inference and conclusion and then there would be no rupture with the missionaries of the past.

  

Instead PISAI interprets the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance as a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the missionaries in Tunisia in 1926.This is poor scholarship.
-Lionel Andrades

DIALOGUE

The course of History of Muslim-Christian Dialogue forms an essential part of the programme of study at PISAI. The historical path taken in this dialogue is based on a study of fundamental documents and important figures. On occasions, certain of the Institute’s guests are invited to share with the students aspects of their personal experience in the field of dialogue. In alternate years, all students have the possibility of visiting the Grand Mosque of Rome and being received there by the Director of the Islamic Cultural Centre or the Imam and the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue and received by its President or its General Secretary.   https://en.pisai.it/academics/dialogue/

FEBRUARY 22, 2020

Italian Government finances Alberto Melloni's Bologna School with a million euros annually : it uses a false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/t.html

 

FEBRUARY 22, 2020

Mons. Marco Gnarvi at the Vicariate, Rome does not use the rational model to interpret Vatican Council II but chooses the irrational version.He is the Parish Priest at the church Santa Maria in Trastevere, Rome. In inter-religious dialogue and ecumenism he uses the false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II. This is a fake version. It's use is unethical.He projects Vatican Council II without the rational interpretation of the Council. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/mons-marco-gnarvi-at-vicariate-rome-he.html

 

FEBRUARY 22, 2020

Croatian Government which opposes Freemasonry still officially interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational option 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/croatian-government-which-opposes.html

 

FEBRUARY 22, 2020

Andrea Torneilli and the Vatican Press Office by now know that they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational model and not the rational one.Pope Francis is probably informed and he must be saying that that we cannot go back to Tradition and the past and yet we cannot interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. We cannot irrationally interpret the Creeds and Catechism. There cannot be a false profession of faith( Professio Fidei). 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/andrea-torneillli-and-vatican-press.html

FEBRUARY 12, 2020

Cardinal Ratzinger's Professio Fidei is based upon the use of the irrational premise,inference and conclusion in the interpretation of magisterial documents including Vatican Council 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/cardinal-ratzingers-professio-fidei-is.html

 

FEBRUARY 12, 2020

Fr.Hunwicke,Brother Alex Bugnolo,Louie Verrecchio and Ann Barnhardt interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise, inference and conclusion to contradict the Athanasius Creed on outside the Church there is no salvation 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/frhunwickebrother-alex-bugnololouie.html

 

FEBRUARY 13, 2020

Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Schonborn interpreted Vatican Council II with the irrational premise, inference and conclusion and then put together the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994).Though the Catechism is Cushingie for them we can interpret it with Feeneyism i.e the rational premise, inference and conclusion. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/cardinal-ratzinger-and-cardinal.html

 

FEBRUARY 12, 2020

50 years of Vatican Council II - drama is over : the Council, EENS, Creeds, Catechisms and BOD, BOB and I.I can be interpreted rationally 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/50-years-of-vatican-council-ii-drama-is.html

 

FEBRUARY 12, 2020

Michael Sean Winters, Massimo Faggioli, John Allen jr and Joshua McElwee agree that even though Yves Congar, Karl Rahner, Richard Cushing and Joseph Ratzinger were there at Vatican Council II. the Council can be interpreted with the rational premise, inference and conclusion. Then it will be in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church, an ecumenism of return and 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), with no known exceptions. None of them are disputing this. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/michael-sean-winters-massimo-faggioli.html

 FEBRUARY 12, 2020

It is not orthodoxy when Roberto dei Mattei interprets the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) with a fake premise, inference and conclusion to create a rupture with 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). For me EENS has no exceptions. For him BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/incomplete-it-is-not-orthodoxy-when.html

  

FEBRUARY 11, 2020

Rome Life Forum 2020 speakers interpret BOD, BOB and I.I and Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion to create a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/rome-life-forum-2020-speakers-interpret_11.html 

 FEBRUARY 11, 2020

All the speakers at the Rome Forum 2020 need to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms, EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I without the irrational premise, inference and conclusion to create a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/all-speakers-at-rome-forum-2020-need-to.html

 FEBRUARY 11, 2020

Rome Life Forum 2020 speakers use an irrational premise, inference and conclusion to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994) to create a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX, Catechism of Pope Pius X etc).  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/rome-life-forum-2020-speakers-use.html

FEBRUARY 11, 2020

Bishop Donald Sanborn, Bishop Daniel Dolan , Fr. Anthony Cekada and Michael and Peter Dimond interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X with an irrational premise and conclusion : they make the same mistake with Vatican Council II.  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/bishop-donald-sanborn-bishop-daniel.html

FEBRUARY 11, 2020

Rome Life Forum 2020 speakers interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise, inference and conclusion to create a false rupture with Tradition, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc.  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/rome-life-forum-2020-speakers-interpret.html

 FEBRUARY 11, 2020

Lepanto Foundation,Correspondenza Romano, Radici Cristiane,RadioRomalibera of Roberto dei Mattei do not rationally interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms, EENS, BOD, BOB and I.I and the Catechism of Pope Pius X : an irrational premise, inference and conclusion is used.  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/lepanto-foundationcorrespondenza-romano.html

FEBRUARY 6, 2020

All the USCCB-approved books on Vatican Council II are based upon this model  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/all-usccb-approved-books-on-vatican.html

FEBRUARY 6, 2020

Ignatius Press- approved books follow this model 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/ignatius-press-approved-books-follow.html

FEBRUARY 6, 2020

Angelus Press-approved books also follow this model  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/angelus-press-approved-books-also.html

EBRUARY 6, 2020St.John Lateran University library for research on Vatican Council II follows this model : all the books on Vatican Council II are written with a false premise  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/stjohn-lateran-university-library-for.html

George Weigel a Catholic American author, political analyst, and social activist serves as a Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and he has been informed that he uses the irrational premise, inference and conclusion to liberally interpret Vatican Council II. He has a rational choice which he overlooks.I have mentioned this to him and other scholars of the Center through e-mails over the last few months.They, it seems, would prefer to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and inference to create a non traditional conclusion, which would be in keeping with the public policy of the Left which they suppport.

George Weigel a Catholic American author, political analyst, and social activist serves as a Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and he has been informed that he uses the irrational premise, inference and conclusion to liberally interpret Vatican Council II. He has a rational choice which he overlooks.I have mentioned this to him and other scholars of the Center through e-mails over the last few months.They, it seems, would prefer to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and inference to create a non traditional conclusion, which would be in keeping with the public policy of the Left which they suppport.

    

 

-Lionel Andrades

 FEBRUARY 22, 2020

Fr. David Koonce, LC,Dean of Theology and Fr. Alex Yeung, LC, Dean of Philosophy, University Pontifical Regina Apostolorum, (UPRA), Rome use the false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents. So an artificial rupture is created with Catholic Tradition.It would be the same with the Grand Chancellor of UPRA, Fr.John Connor LC and the Rector Fr.José E. Oyarzún, L.C

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/fr-david-koonce-lcdean-of-theology-and.html

 FEBRUARY 22, 2020

Italian Government finances Alberto Melloni's Bologna School with a million euros annually : it uses a false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/t.html

 FEBRUARY 22, 2020

Mons. Marco Gnarvi at the Vicariate, Rome does not use the rational model to interpret Vatican Council II but chooses the irrational version.He is the Parish Priest at the church Santa Maria in Trastevere, Rome. In inter-religious dialogue and ecumenism he uses the false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II. This is a fake version. It's use is unethical.He projects Vatican Council II without the rational interpretation of the Council.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/mons-marco-gnarvi-at-vicariate-rome-he.html

Adorazione Eucaristica - Medjugorje 20 febbraio 2020

Pro-lifers file lawsuit against abortion activist after assault at Toronto university (video)

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-lifers-file-lawsuit-against-abortion-activist-after-assault-at-toronto-university

Watch the video of the attack:

As a result of the charges, Skwarko was suspended from the school and then barred from the university campus for a year. She also lost a job working as an assistant at Ryerson’s Social Innovation Office.

In late April of 2019, Skwarko pleaded guilty to her charges in court and gave an apology to Somers and Alleyne. She was given a conditional discharge along with 18 months’ probation. Due to the nature of her charges, she did not gain a criminal record. 

Somers says the main reason for seeking damages from Skwarko is to seek justice for the attack, which caused her to suffer undue mental and physical harm. 

“There was a lot of damage done by the assault that I wouldn’t have foreseen at the time. I was physically injured, I had to go to a psychologist because I was terrified to go back on the street,” Somers told LifeSiteNews.

Somers said the main reason for including the former Ryerson Students’ Union in the suit along with Skwarko is because she feels they did not do their job in helping to prevent the escalation of violence occurring in the lead up to the assault. 

“We feel that the Ryerson Student Union did a very bad job of deterring this escalating violence and we would like to send a message that they had a responsibility to do so,” Somers said to LifeSiteNews.

“We would like it to send a message to other student unions that they have an obligation to deter violence on the part of their members towards the public and student body.” 

Despite taking nearly a year for her to return to doing pro-life outreach, Somers says that she will continue with the pro-life cause in the Greater Toronto Area, even though it comes with risks and goes against the wishes of her family, who are concerned for her safety. 

“I went from having a harmonious life and now having PTSD and not doing pro-life outreach for a long time. We’re not just out there protesting abortion. We are also acting as a representation of alternative choices,” said Somers to LifeSiteNews.

Continued

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-lifers-file-lawsuit-against-abortion-activist-after-assault-at-toronto-university