-Lionel AndradesWednesday, June 1, 2022
Ce due interpretazione di Concilio Vaticano II - uno e razionale e l'altra irrazionale. Il Concilio e dogmatica.
MAY 31, 2022
Ce due interpretazione di Concilio Vaticano II - uno e razionale e l'altra irrazionale : per Vescovo Atanasio Schneider Lumen Gentium 14 ci sono invisibile in 2022. Per Papa Francesco e Papa Benedetto, ci sono visibile fisicamente ( Grafica )
MAY 30, 2022
Ce due interpretazione di Concilio Vaticano II - uno e razionale e l'altra irrazionale ( Grafica )
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS
OF VATICAN COUNCIL II :
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
MAY 31, 2022
MAY 31, 2022
Vatican Council II ( Rational ) is dogmatic. It supports Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For Bishop Athanasius Schneider Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism of desire) is not a practical exception for EENS. But for Pope Francis and Pope Benedict it is . We have a conflict on doctrine, with the use of the False and Rational Premise.
MAY 27, 2022
MAY 27, 2022
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
