Tuesday, September 19, 2023
If the Lega as a political party would interpret Vatican Council II rationally then they could ask Pope Francis to come back to Tradition and be a conservative pope, like the popes over history in Italy.
If the Lega as a political party would interpret Vatican Council II
rationally i.e. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to only
hypothetical and physically invisible cases in 1965-2023) then they could ask
Pope Francis to come back to Tradition and be a conservative pope, like the
popes over history in Italy.
When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally, is has no exceptions
for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). It was known to the popes
during the time of the Papal States in Europe that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were no visible exceptions for the traditional strict interpretation of EENS. Europe was Catholic. It was
known at the time of the Austro-Hungarian Catholic Empire that the dogma EENS meant all non Catholics are oriented to Hell without Catholic faith and the baptism of water. Europe was Roman
Catholic and not just Christian. The Catholic Church in Europe was the center
for the growth of science, astronomy etc.
It was understood at that time that in Heaven there are only Catholics. So it was important to have a non separation of Church and State
and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics legislation to save souls from the fires of Hell.
VATICAN COUNCIL II MUST NO LONGER BE LIBERAL
Now the right wing political parties cannot get the support of a liberal
Catholic Church because Vatican Council II is liberal, as it is commonly interpreted.It is commonly irrationally i.e. it has objective exceptions in 1965-2023 for the dogma EENS. So the Athanasius Creed
which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation is made obsolete.
Since there is alleged ‘known salvation’ outside the Catholic Church it is
asked why should everyone be Catholic? Sinceit is assumed there is known
salvation outside the Church and not everyone needs to enter the Church, there
is a New Theology.It says outside the Church there is salvation. With this
error in theology they created a New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology,
New Evangelization and New Canon Law. All the ‘new stuff’ is based upon the
irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
But now we know how the New Theology was created upon an error.It was the interpretation of Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. So the foundation of the New Theology is fake.
It is in the interest of the political parties like the Lega, Forza Nuova etc, to only interpret Vatican Council II rationally and insist that the Vatican and the Italian Government do the same. This is also ethical in the secular sense. - Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 18, 2023
Salvini and Le Pen have made an alliance at Pontida but without the Catholic Church. If they interpreted Vatican Council II rationally the Church would be forced to do the same and then the Catholic Church would be conservative once again.
Salvini and Le Pen have made an alliance at Pontida but without the Catholic Church. If they interpreted Vatican Council II rationally the Church would be forced to do the same and then the Catholic Church would be conservative once again. - Lionel Andrades
______________________________________________________
SEPTEMBER 9, 2023
The discovery
The discovery
We have a discovery today. It’s ‘a small point’ but this small point turns the Council around. From liberalism the Council returns to Tradition. So by ignoring this small point, we have liberalism in the Church. This small point, is the premise: the rational and irrational premise. It decides if Vatican Council II has a continuity or break with Tradition. This is the discovery. We now have a switch. We can turn it off or on. We can choose a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors or a rupture with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
former Staff Reporter, daily Morning News, Karachi, Pakistan.
Recipient of the All Pakistan Newspaper Society (APNS) Best Reporter of the Year Award, presented by the Prime Minister of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto.
Recipient of the Pakistan Government's Award for Literature ( Childrens stories).
Teacher of English and Church History at the Catholic Minor Seminary, Rawalpindi.
Bishop Anthony Lobo
Sent to Rome for Ministerial Priesthood by Bishop Anthony Lobo, bishop of Rawalpindi-Islamabad, Pakistan.
Discriminated against by the pontifical universities and seminaries in Rome.He interprets Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally. So there is a continuity with Tradition. He is not allowed to study at pontifical universities in Rome, where it is obligatory to interpret Magisterial Documents, irrationally and unethically.Catholic students and seminarians are discriminated against. This is public and official.
However we have a new discovery in the Catholic Church. There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral, when it is interpreted rationally i.e LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases. So they are not objective examples of salvation. They are not objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.The Creeds must not be changed.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version of the Creeds, Catechisms and Councils, which is heretical, non-traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents and call it Catholic.
Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray, Balthazar, Kung, Lefebvre and Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally. We can today choose to interpret the Council rationally and in harmony with Tradition.
Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/
Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
