Petition the popes:1) Are there really exceptions to EENS ? 2) Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II make an objective error?

Petition the popes:1) Are there really exceptions to EENS ? 2) Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II make an objective error?


The two popes need to be petitioned. Appeal to them to clarify the Catholic Church's position on  the following.

A.The baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to invisible and hypothetical cases and not personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2019 ?

B.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II also refer to invisible and hypothetical cases and not personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2019 ?

For the St.Benedict Center, New Hampshire, BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc refer to personally unknown cases. While for Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Archbishops Morandi and Di Noia, these are references to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So CCC 847-848 are exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) for the CDF.

For Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior, St. Benedict Center, N.H, Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth in other religions) does not refer to an objective exception to EENS. Neither would he know of a non Catholic saved outside the Church, where the true Church of Christ allegedly subsists(LG 8).But for Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF, LG 8 was an exception to EENS. He informed the correspondent of the Associated Press that the Church no more taught that it had the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation he cited Lumen Gentium 8. (Placquet Deo Press Conference March 2018).

So Pope Benedict and Pope Francis could be asked to clarify the correct and rational teaching of the Church.

Let us know their views on the following four points, also being asked of the Diocese of Manchester, USA.

1.Do we humans personally know any one saved outside the Catholic Church with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance in 2019?  Answer: No

2.Do we personally know any one saved outside the Catholic Church i.e without Catholic faith and the baptism of water, with 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8), 'imperfect communion with the Church'(UR 3), being people of goodwill (GS 22) etc, in 2019? Answer : No.

3.So do you think the St.Benedict Center in New Hampshire is correct in saying outside the Church there is no salvation? Answer: Yes.

4.Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation ( and BOD, BOB and I.I are invisible and unknown), the Catechism of Pope Pius X says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) says the Catholic Church is like the Ark of Noah in which all need to enter for salvation(CCC 845).

Do you know any objective exception to these  teaching in Vatican Council II and the Catechisms? 2   Answer: No

So the final questions are :-

1.Did the Letter of the Holy Office(CDF) in 1949(LOHO) and Vatican Council II make an objective mistake and then create a New Theology upon it ?

2.Is the New Theology based on allegedly visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc objectively false and not Catholic ? 

The present two popes and the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) interpret LOHO and Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.This is an artificial creation. It is a break with EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century,Pope Benedict confirmed( Avvenire March 2016). 

Pope Francis has proclaimed the kerygma  without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.His new joint-ecumenical evangelisation  is also based upon there being known salvation outside the Catholic Church.This is irrational.His premise and inference upon which he basis his New Theology is false.Literally there are no no exceptions to EENS.
Yet the St. Benedict Center and all Catholics in general have to say that invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I  and LG 8 etc  are physically visible exceptions to EENS to be recognized legally as being Catholics.
The questions above determine if BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc are literally known or not known. Since then we can identify the premise upon which a theology is created. 
The New Theology is created upon personally known exceptions to EENS. Without this irrational premise Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents can be interpreted in harmony with Feeneyite EENS.We have discovered the missing link. We now know when Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of rupture and when it can be avoided.Avoid the premise and return to Sacred Tradition.
So first we need to know if there are literal cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc and then decide if the theology is rational.How can we accept a theology based upon invisible and non existing people in our reality ?
 It would be irrational to support the new theology based upon alleged known non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times.
The popes can be petitioned and asked for their opinion on this issue so that they can correct the mistake.We can interpret and accept Vatican Council II without the mistake.-Lionel Andrades