UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?

Comment from the blog The Eponymous Flower,

"The Vatican II Revolution Reexamined"

David Martin,

UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? 

If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?

-Lionel

The differences that exist in varying degrees between them [separated brethren] and the Catholic Church … do indeed create many obstacles … But even in spite of them it remains true that all who have been justified by faith in Baptism are members of Christ's body. [UR-3]

This contradicts the encyclical letter of Pope Pius XII which dogmatically defined that only those who profess the One True Faith are included as members of Christ’s Church.

Only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith, and who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or been excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed. (Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, 1943)

-Lionel Andrades
https://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-vatican-ii-revolution-reexamined_27.html