Peter Kwasniewski and Steve Skojec are comfortable with the error : in this way they are not obligated to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Peter Kwasniewski and Steve Skojec have read what I have written and they are not going to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Instead they will expediently maintain that invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to EENS.Also for them unknown people referenced in Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) allegedly saved outside the Church,are personally known and physically seen non Catholics. So in this way they become exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.The irrationality helps. They do not want to be considered Anti-Semitic.It is the same with the SSPX bishops and priests.Even the St.Benedict Centers do not want to affirm Feeneyite EENS.

On March 1, 2018 Cardinal Ladaria denied it and in March 2016 Pope Benedict did the same.

I am the only one who is saying invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are invisible. They are  not visible.So I do not reject EENS according to the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century.Practically there are no exceptions.

Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct.Literally, there are no cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.

Literally, for me too there are no exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.

So the Catholic Church in Vatican Council II (AG 7) indicates that all non Catholics need to enter the Church as members, with Catholic faith and the baptism of water and there can be no known exception on earth.

It also means most people go to Hell since they die outside the Church. In Heaven there are only Catholics.The Catholic Church is the Mystical Body of Jesus and we do not know anyone saved outside the Church. Peter Kwasniewski,Steve Skojec, Fr.Brian Harrison, Joseph Shaw and the other traditionalists do not want to say this.

The SSPX website says BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS. Their Angelus Press sells a book written by Fr. Francois Laisney supporting visible for them cases of BOD,BOB and I.I ( Is Feeneyism Catholic?).
Michael Matt now at the Remnant approved this book and criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney.
The SSPX goes to doctrinal talks interpreting magisterial documents contradicting each other and they do not deny it.Since if they deny it they would have to affirm Feeneyite EENS.

Similarly the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX for Kwasniewski and Skojec and they do not deny it.Since if they deny it they would have to affirm Feeneyite EENS.

For Phil Lawler and the faculty at the St.Thomas More College for Liberal Arts, N.H, USA, St.Thomas Aquinas contradicts himself.The faculty do not deny it.Otherwise they would have to affirm what the secular media calls 'the rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS and the Archbishop of Boston,Cardinal Sean O'Malley,  would protest.

Prudent traditionalists Hilary White and Ann Barnhardt are comfortable with the error.Louie Verrecchio has a family to support, so also, the alleged conservatives Robert Fastiggi and Ralph Martin in Detroit, USA.

Bishops, only give the mandatam to teach theology to those who say BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church.The priests who are rational and deny this error cannot be incardinated.They are not allowed to licitly offer Holy Mass.With the irrational premise and inference, however they can licitly but heretically and sacrilegeously offer Holy Mass in any Rite.

So Fr. John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with the error and so do the dubbia cardinals and those who signed the Filial Correction.

None of them want to affirm Feeneyite EENS.They will be ready to accept the Catechisms contradicting themselves, Vatican Council II contradicting the past ecclesiology and there being a new understanding of the Apostles, Nicene and Athanasius Creed.A new Profession of Faith  with the Nicene Creed supporting modernism.
They will accept all this doctrinal and theological confusion as long as they do not have to affirm EENS like the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century when they offered the Tridentine Rite Mass.-Lionel Andrades