I have sent these blog posts to Mary Ellen Mahon and Kelly Goodreau and there is no reply. No reply too from the Very Rev. Georges de Laire.
Mahon and Goodreau are catechists in the Diocese of Manchester, USA they should be prompt to give an account of their Catholic faith.There is no comment from the Vocational Director, Fr. Matthew Mason.If a young man with a religious vocation would ask him these four questions,he would not answer.1
The young man with a vocation to the priesthood would be given false answers, the concept being ' the red is an exception to the blue' and 'invisible people are visible'.Mahon, Goodreau and Mason are of course only following the instructions of their superiors.
They know that Bishop Peter Libasci and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) are teaching irrational philosophy( invisible people are visible) but they will keep silent. They will even teach it to others.
This irrationality is what gives them their identity.It makes them the new-Church, Am-Church or the false church within the Catholic Church.
They approve of 'Precepts of Prohibitions'on the diocese website against the St.Benedict Center(SBC). Since the SBC in the diocese will not say that 'the red is an exception to the blue' and 'invisible non Catholics are visible' in New Hampshire.
In an e-mail to me,Mary Ellen Mahon has said that the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St.Benedict Center cannot be considered Catholic.
Mahon, is Director for Catholic Education in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester.
Those who interpret Vatican Council II rationally and do not reject the Council, which is in harmony with other magisterial documents( when interpreted rationally) are not considered Catholic.Mary Ellen Mahon does not do this.So she is considered Catholic by Bishop Libasci and the CDF.
Those who interpret Vatican Council II, without the false premise and in harmony with exclusive salvation, the old ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return are not Catholic for Mahon. Mahon interprets Vatican Council II with the false invisble-non-Catholics-are-visible theory.So she artificially creates a rupture with the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.Then she is officially accepted as a Catholic, by the CDF and Bishop Libasci.
Someone is a Catholic for Mary Ellen Mahon, who uses the invisible people are visible theory to contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X.It says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.It mentions that the followers of other religions are outside the Church.
Similarly to be a Catholic the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) has to be put aside, when it says that the Catholic Church is like the Ark of Noah in which all must enter for salvation (CCC 845).
This is her criteria for being Catholic for , for example, a Catholic judge in a secular court or tribunal in New England, USA.
A Catholic professor or a head of a social or charitable organisation in New Hampshire would also not be Catholic for Mary Ellen Mahon if they say that invisible people who do not exist in our reality cannot be objective exceptions to EENS. They cannot be cited as literal exceptions to all needing to enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism for salvation in 2019.Invisible non Catholics are visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) for Mahon however,in 2019.
She has not denied this in our communication.
This is how Bishop Peter Libasci and the bishops in Boston, would expect her to interpret Vatican Council II,Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Catechisms and Creeds and EENS, to be a Catholic catechist.
A Catholic professor or a head of a social or charitable organisation in New Hampshire would also not be Catholic for Mary Ellen Mahon if they say that invisible people who do not exist in our reality cannot be objective exceptions to EENS. They cannot be cited as literal exceptions to all needing to enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism for salvation in 2019.Invisible non Catholics are visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) for Mahon however,in 2019.
She has not denied this in our communication.
This is how Bishop Peter Libasci and the bishops in Boston, would expect her to interpret Vatican Council II,Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Catechisms and Creeds and EENS, to be a Catholic catechist.
Mary Ellen Mahon, Director for Catholic Education in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester, knows she teaches an irrationality in the interpretation of magisterial documents. She does not deny it. For her this is being Catholic.-Lionel Andrades
1
1.Do
we humans personally know any one saved outside the Catholic Church
with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible
ignorance in 2019? Answer: No
2.Do
we personally know any one saved outside the Catholic Church i.e
without Catholic faith and the baptism of water, with 'elements of
sanctification and truth'(LG 8), 'imperfect communion with the
Church'(UR 3), being people of goodwill (GS 22) etc, in 2019? Answer : No.
3.So
do you think the St.Benedict Center in New Hampshire is correct in
saying outside the Church there is no salvation? Answer: Yes.
4.Vatican
Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation ( and BOD, BOB
and I.I are invisible and unknown), the Catechism of Pope Pius X says
all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and the
Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) says the Catholic Church is like
the Ark of Noah in which all need to enter for salvation(CCC 845).
Do you
know any objective exception to these teaching in Vatican Council II
and the Catechisms? 2 Answer: No
Even
the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary the religious community of
Fr. Leonard Feeney in the diocese would answer these four questions like
Mahon and Goodreau.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/mary-ellen-mahon-and-kelly-goodreau.html
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment