They teach Catechism with a false premise to avoid Catholic Tradition according to the past Catechisms

 

 

 

 

They teach Catechism with a false premise to avoid Catholic Tradition. Mary Jane Silvia, Director of Adult Faith Formation,  Mary Ellen Mahon, Cabinet Secretary for Catholic Formation & Director of Pastoral Ministry and  Kelly Goudreau Director of Parish Faith Formation and Youth Ministry in the Diocese of Manchester, USA,  interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition and in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it is interpreted by the St. Benedict Center, N.H in the diocese. They  officially teach this error to children, youth and adults in the diocese. There is no denial from them. -Lionel Andrades

The the writers of Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma and the Catechism of the Catholic Church( see photo below) affirm the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which interpreted the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance with a false premise. So a New Theology was created. The past theology said outside the Church there is no salvation and the present one says there is.  How come?! Since invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance etc, which could only be known to God, were projected as practical exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology. They were seen as exceptions to the past teaching on their being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

 

___________________________

Now even the old Catechisms are interpreted irrationally. Where ever the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance and the baptism of blood are mentioned, they are interpreted with the false premise. So they become practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the traditional ecumenism of return.The  Syllabus of Errors is made obsolete. The liberals and Lefebvrists make the same  mistake. This is the error also in the Diocese of Manchester,USA when they teach Catechism. This is official modernism. It makes the Oath Against Modernism, the Profession of Faith and Oath of the Bishop obsolete.The heresy,schism and irrationality is the norm in the Catholic Church today.

_________________________________________

There can be various methods to present the Catechism but the doctrine and theology is wrong, it is a rupture with traditional Catechism. The false premise is used to interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance. So the meaning is changed of Vatican Council II, all the Catechisms and the Creeds. So there can be new presentations of innovation and dissent mistaken as the Deposit of the Faith.

___________ 

____________________________

The Old Catechisms are interpreted irrationally like the Catechism of the Catholic Church. 

The Traditional Catechisms on the website Whispers of Restoration are interpreted with the false premise.It is the same error made in the teaching of Catechism in the liberal Diocese of Manchester, USA by the teachers in the photos above.

______________

 

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2019/06/what-good-is-changing-catechism.html

Peter Kwasniewski interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church with the same error as the Catechism teachers at Manchester. So there is 'a new revelation' in the Church for all of them. Kwasniewshi refuses to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus like St. Thoma Aquinas.He interprets Vatican Council II with the objective mistake of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. So he will criticize the New Theology and also use it to interpret Magisterial documents.

_____________

The Catechism of the Council of Trent refers to 'the desire thereof' which refers to an invisible case in 2021.It is always hypothetical.If it exists can only be known to God. Yet the traditionalists interpret the Catechism of the Council of Trent (baptism of desire) as contradicting Feeneyite EENS. This is irrational. With this error the New Theology is created.

_____________

The blurb is false. Since it depends upon how you interpret this Catechism that you get your result- traditional or non traditional. Do you use a false premise or do you avoid it? Are you a Cushingite or Feeneyite ?This determinses the conclusion. It is the same with Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades