At the
Placuit Deo press conference (2018) Cardinal Ladaria was critical of neo
Gnosticism and Pelagianism heresy.Now we know that he was referring to Catholic
orthodoxy.Those who affirm Catholic orthodoxy would be gnostic similar to the
political hate of the political Left.
At the conference when he was asked
to given specific examples of heresy in the present times, he would not do so.
So mortal sins of faith will
officially be excommunicated by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith(CDF).It will be enforced as Catholic doctrine.So the CDF will work for
Satan instead of God.
The Church
has gone into reverse on faith and morals.
The CDF’s
critical statement on homosexual unions, was orthodoxy, and it could be
gnosticism in future, after Cardinal Ladaria retires.
In the 16th
century gnosticism referred to heresy whch rejected Catholic orthodoxy. Now it
is the opposite.
Since 1965
wer have a political version of Vatican Council II whose conclusion would be
gnostic for the 16th century Magisterium and missionaries of that time.In
future when Vatican Council II is interpreted without the fake premise,
inference and non traditional conclusion, supporting Tradition, and not
opposing it like today, Vatican Council II will be considered heretical and
gnostic.
In future
the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) could be labelled a gnostic organisation and
legally not Catholic.They could be excommunicated.
Public signs of ‘the true Church’ will be prohibited.Bishop Robert Barron’s Word on Fire and the National Catholic Reporter, Commonweal, Tablet and Crux, interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise.So they will get a pass.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 17, 2021
Pope Francis wants inculturation with Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise to create ideology supported by the Left : Vatican Council II interpreted with the rational premise would affirm Tradition and this would be 'nostalgia' for him : Message to Latin American Conference on Religious Life
When Pope Francis and the Confederation of Latin American and Caribbean Religious (CLAR) commonly interpret Vatican Council with a false premise, inference and non traditional conclusion it supports the Leftist ideology. It is ideological.
So presently there is inculturation in the Latin American and Caribbean countries,like also those in Asia and elsewhere, but with the ideological interpretation of Vatican Council II.
If there was Holy Mass in the vernacular in these countries and if they interpreted Vatican Council II with the rational premise there would be harmony with the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.This would be opposed by the Left and Pope Francis would consider Vatican Council II ideological.He would consider it nostalgia.
He only wants an inculturazation with the leftist ideology.So the false premise is indispensable.
If the FSSP and SSPX go back to Tradition while putting aside Vatican Council II, interpreted with the false premise,this produces the wrong ideology for Pope Francis. It is not that of the ADL and those who are working for a universal religion with the Anti Christ present .This is the political ideology, all bishops will have to support, to approve Mass in any rite, vernacular or Latin.
If the FSSP and the SSPX begin to offer Mass in the vernacular and interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, they could show Pope Francis that the political ideology, either way, does not depend upon the liturgy.The new doctrines are created when Vatican Council II is intentionally interpreted without the rational premise, by the present two popes, the cardinals and the bishops.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment