In
interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as referring
to invisible and unknown people in 2022. Bishop Roland Minnerath interprets
them as referring to physically visible and known non Catholics saves outside
the Church without faith and the baptism of water. No one is formally asking
Bishop Minnerath to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, only.
He
has written a book supporting a theology of religions and another book critical
of the Syllabus of Errors. In both these books he used the False Premise (invisible
cases are visible) to interpret Vatican Council II.
So
with the False Premise these books are Christocentric and not Ecclesiocentric/
Christocentric. The False Premise creates the New Theology which projects
exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism. His books are written with the New
Theology and not the old theology. He supports the New Ecumenism, since with
the False Premise he creates exceptions for the old ecumenism of return.
Vocations
to the religious life in Dijon, France must be told to interpret Vatican
Council II only with the Rational Premise.
Religious
Superiors must make their Profession of Faith and take their Oath of Office in
public, only by accepting and affirming Vatican Council II (Rational). -Lionel Andrades
June 29, 2021
Bishop Roland Minnerath has interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and with this error has written a book on 'the theology of religions' he has also interpreted the Syllabus of Errors with a false premise and published books with this error
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/06/bishop-roland-minnerath-has-interpreted
NOVEMBER 23, 2021
Vocations to the Religious Life in Dijon, France have to interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc) with a False Premise and so reject the traditional interpretation of the Creeds and Catechisms to be politically correct with Macron and the Left in France.It is the same in Spain and England.
Vocations to the Religious Life in Dijon, France have to interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc) with a False Premise and so reject the traditional interpretation of the Creeds and Catechisms to be politically correct with Macron and the Left in France.It is the same in Spain and England.Those Catholics who go for Holy Mass in the vernacular could take up this issue with the their bishops.
The diocesan priests in Dijon who offer Holy Mass in French could ask Bishop Roland Minnerath to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so also the Creeds, Catechisms and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Then there will not be doctrinal division with the past Magisterium at the Novus Ordo Mass.
Archbishop Arthur Roche when he was the bishop of Leeds, England, would not affirm the dogma EENS since he wanted to interpret the BOD, BOB and I.I with the fake premise, for political reasons.
The same ruse is followed by Andrea Grillo and the professors at the Benedictine University of St. Anselm, Rome, when they attend Holy Mass in Italian.They have courses in liturgy, with academic degrees being given, which are approved by Archbishop Arthur Roche.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment