Pope Francis and Cardinal Comastri when speaking about the First Commandment could not say that there was true worship in only the Catholic Church : Now they even reject the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation

 Pope Francis and Cardinal Comastri when speaking about the First Commandment could not say that there was true worship in only the Catholic Church. Since they both use the false premise to interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), the baptism of blood (BOB)and invincible ignorance(I.I) with the irrational premise. They assume that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times.So for them there is known salvation outside the Church. For them there are practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So non Catholics are saved outside the Church even as non Christians or non believers in God.

If they used the rational premise ( blue passages ) then outside the Church there would be no known salvation and so then they would have to say that there is true worship in only the Catholic Church and that this is the only one true Church or Christ(UR 2) and the Catholics are the new people of God ( NA 4).Now they even reject the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation. -Lionel Andrades

 SEPTEMBER 7, 2020

Pope Francis uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and this contradicts the First Commandment.TV 2000 did not bring up this point in a recent interview on the Creed. He interprets the Creed with the irrational premise.

 

Pope Francis uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and this contradicts the First Commandment.TV 2000 did not bring up this point in a recent interview on the Creed. He interprets the Creed with the irrational premise.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/09/pope-francis-uses-false-premise-to.html

SEPTEMBER 5, 2020

Cardinal Comastri interprets BOD, BOB and I.I with a false premise and so there are exceptions to EENS for him, there are also exceptions to traditional salvation and the First Commandment. So he cannot say that Catholics only worshop the true God: he limits himself to the worldly gods of sex and money

  

Cardinal Comastri  interprets the baptism of desire(BOD), the baptism of blood (BOB) and invincible ignorance ( I.I) with a false premise and so there are exceptions to EENS for him, there are also exceptions to traditional salvation and the First Commandment. So he cannot say that Catholics only worshop the true God.He limits himself in the video to the worldly gods of sex and money. -Lionel Andrades

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2020

Cardinal Angelo Comastri like Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in explaining the First Commandment could not say that in the Catholic Church there is true worship

 Cardinal Angelo Comastri like Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger  in explaining the First Commandment could not say  that in the Catholic Church there is true worship and the other religions are not paths to salvation. Since for them hypothetical cases of Lumen Gentium 16  etc are real exceptions to exclusivist  salvation in the Catholic Church. -Lionel Andrades

Come sarebbe più bello il Mondo se seguissimo questa saggia segnaletica che Dio ci ha dato (Youtube)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC6AICaoapY

BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE

Fake premise

The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically visible cases in 1949-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

Fake conclusion

So they contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake.

BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE

Rational Premise

The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021

They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

Rational Conclusion

They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.

__________

VATICAN COUNCIL II

Fake premise

Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

Fake conclusion

Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.

VATICAN COUNCIL II

Rational Premise

 Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium  14 and Lumen Gentium 16  in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion

Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A

_____________________