John Allen Jr and George Weigel have written books on Pope Benedict and neither of them have mentioned the Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion (hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition) in the liberal theology of the CDF Prefect

 

John Allen Jr and George Weigel have written books on Pope Benedict and neither of them have mentioned the Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion (hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition) in the liberal theology of the former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

Without the False Premise there would be no liberalism, which they both support.

John Allen has written a report critical of the Latin Mass but without the Fake Premise, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II he would have to return to the old theology of the Latin Mass. Presently his interpretation of the Council, like that of Pope Francis, is dishonest and obsolete.

For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc refer to physically invisible people in 1965-2022.For them LG 8 etc refer to physically visible cases. It is only with this dishonesty that they can pretend that Vatican Council II contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc.

-Lionel Andrades