The Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake and Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct.The baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are not objective exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). They are always hypothetical. Pope Paul VI and the Council Fathers(1965) at Vatican Council II made an objective mistake.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are hypothetical and speculative only.They are not objective exceptions to Tradition(EENS etc). Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd make the same mistake as the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Pope Paul VI

 The Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake and Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct.The baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are not objective exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). They are always hypothetical.

Pope Paul VI and the Council Fathers(1965) at Vatican Council II made an objective mistake.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are hypothetical and speculative only.They are not objective exceptions to Tradition(EENS etc). Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd make the same mistake as the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Pope Paul VI.-Lionel Andrades