Cardinal Hummes did not know that Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise was in line with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). The Council is in harmony with the past faith and morals and also the old Catechisms.

 

This blog post is compiled from tweets on Twitter.

Cardinal Hummes did not know that Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise was in line with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). The Council is in harmony with the past faith and morals and also the old Catechisms. So the non Catholic Amazonians are oriented to Hell without faith and the baptism of water.

There are not exceptions of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc for Feeneyite EENS.

When Vatican Council II is interpreted with a Rational Premise the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA affirms Feeneyite EENS and so also traditional faith and morals. So the Council does not contradict the past Catechisms. So homosexual relations are a mortal sin according to the past Catechisms and Vatican Council II.

We can cite not only the Catechism of the Catholic Church against homsexual relations being 'intrinsically evil' but also the past Catechisms, which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II ( Rational).

No one told Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX that Vatican Council II could be interpreted rationally in harmony with the traditional faith and morals and also salvation-theology.

The SSPX continues to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise unlike Brother Andre Marie MICM. They also interpret the baptism of desire with the False Premise unlike the St. Benedict Center. There is no comment from them. There is no denial.

The bishops in Britain need to accept and interpret Vatican Council II like Brother Andre Marie and not Fr. Georges de Laire.Then they will have to affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS.

The FSSP must not interpret Vatican Council II like Bishop Bernard Fellay and Cardinal Walter Kasper but like Brother Andre Marie MICM.

All future SSPX priests and deacons at Econe must interpret Vatican Council II like Brother Andre Marie and not Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Jean Marie Gleize and Fr. Francois Laisney.

All future priests in France can interpret Vatican Council II like Brother Andre Marie and not Fr. Georges de Laire.

If the new priests at Econe interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise they will return to Tradition.They will return to Tradition without having to reject Vatican Council II. They could demand canonical recognition like any other religious community affirming Feeneyite EENS and Vatican Council II ( Rational ).

The Holy Spirit cannot interpret the Council with a False Premise instead of the Rational Premise. The Council is traditional and exclusivist. It is in harmony with the past Magisterium on EENS, the Syllabus of Errors etc.

Bishop Bernard Fellay for most of his life interpreted Vatican Council II with a False Premise. He did not know about the Rational Premise. It is the same with the present Superior General. They follow the liberal Judicial Vicar in the Diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire.

Cardinal Hummes all his life interpreted Vatican Council II with a False Premise creating a Fake Break with EENS and then at the Amazon Synod he criticized the SSPX for rejecting EENS. There was no statement from the SSPX or Coetus International on Vatican Council II (Rational) being in harmony with EENS.

We must re-interpret the Council with the Rational Premise and then it says that outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation.

‘The Great Façade’ by Christopher Ferrara was written with Vatican Council II interpreted with a False Premise. Also the book ‘Is Feeneyism Catholic’ by Fr. Francois Laisney of the SSPX ( Angelus Press) had Vatican Council II, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, interpreted with the Irrational and not Rational Premise.

If all the seminarians at Econe interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise they will be affirming Feeneyite EENS.Fr. Francois Laisney’s book, ‘Is Feeneyism Catholic?’ can be thrown out.

 Future SSPX priests will only be Feeneyite since there is only one rational option available for the interpretation of the Council.

The Council interpreted rationally is in harmony with only the pre-1962 Roman Missal.

John Courtney Murray supported division in the Church when he interpreted Vatican Council II with a False and not Rational Premise. His writings on Religious Liberty are useless when the Council is seen with the traditional Rational Premise.

We need a Catechesis only with Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise. Presently the common False Premise is used in catechesis in the Novus Ordo parishes. The SSPX also interprets Vatican Council II with the False Premise.

-Lionel Andrades