E-mail correspondence
Lionel:
...we agree here though this is not the real issue.
Since
we agree that we cannot identify any exceptions to the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and there are no visible cases of the
baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in
invincible ignorance(I.I),outside or within the Church, are
you saying that in general, all non Catholics on earth in 2019 are
oriented to Hell without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7) and they need to
accept Jesus in the Catholic Church for salvation?
Since
for me there are no exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith
and baptism for salvation, Vatican Council II is saying that ll need to
formally enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism to avoid Hell
( for salvation). Would it be the same for you ?
Similarly
since LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 2 etc in Vatican Council II refer to
only hypothetical cases, we cannot identify such cases on earth; they
are not real people in the present times, there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS ?
Then
would you say that Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office
1949 was wrong in the Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO), since LOHO
assumed BOD, BOB and I.I were exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and
criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center in the text of
the Letter?
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment