Whom to believe ?

 

Father Paolo Bomus, the Parish Priest at Sant Agapito, Rome said there are no visible cases of people being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc as referenced in Vatican Council II. There are no physically visible cases of non Catholics saved as referenced in LG 14,16,UR 3, NA ,2 GS 22 etc.

So he implies that LG 16 etc are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider told Dr. Taylor Marshall that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire. He implied that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc were only hypothetical and speculative.

So he too was saying that Vatican Council II is not a break with the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation of Pope Boniface VIII in Unam Sanctam.

On the other hand for Alberto Melloni of the FSCIRE, the Bologna School, Italy, financed by the leftist Italian government, Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition. So he implies that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically visible cases, known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in 1965-2023.

Also for Father Davide Pagliarani, the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).He was elected by Bishop Alfonso Galareretta and Fr. Christian Bouchacourt (Second Assistant), who also interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation of the Council of Florence 1442.

So they imply that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases, at least, in their reality.

Whom to believe? -Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 7, 2023

I have e-mailed Alberto Melloni and his colleagues at the FSCIRE about their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and there is no denial from them. They actually agree with me : Is it legal when Melloni receives, reportedly, over a million euros annually, and intentionally interprets LG 8,1,4,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 irrationally and dishonestly ?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/12/i-have-e-mailed-alberto-melloni-and-his.html

DECEMBER 8, 2023

What is the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II ? (Updated 08.12.2023 ) /21. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and the Bishop of Manchester, New Hampshire have made a public error in the case of the St.Benedict Center ?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/12/what-is-lionel-andrades-interpretation_8.html

NOVEMBER 19, 2023

You can interpret Vatican Council II according to Pope Paul VI or Lionel Andrades. Vatican Council II can be Cushingite or Feeneyite, with the irrational premise (invisible non-Catholics are physically visible) or rational premise (invisible cases are invisible only). So the conclusion is different. The Council is non traditional or traditional. It depends upon the premise, inference and conclusion, chosen.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/11/you-can-interpret-vatican-council-ii.html