The ten state that marriages contracted with the SSPX were always valid due to the present crisis of the Church. Therefore they are not ready to register SSPX marriages with the local dioceses and will not accept „to be unjustly governed" by local bishops.
Lionel: The local bishops do not nterpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyite theology.If they did then the Council will be a problem for them.Vatican Council would support the old ecclesiology of the Church which the French SSPX Superiors already affirm and the local bishops deny.
If the local bishops are asked to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite) there will be a new tension. They will refuse to do this.This will create problems with the SSPX priests.The SSPX priests affirm outside the Church there is no salvation by side stepping Vatican Council II(Cushingite) but still with the New Theology. With Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), the local French bishops will want to step away from all magisterial documents interpreted with Feeneyism, with rationality in philosophy.Without the New Theology they are back to the 'old religion' which the SSPX affirms.
___________________________________________
They expected the SSPX to be recognised by the Vatican while remaining independent from the local bishops but fear that the bishops, after this first step, will get further possibilities to influence internal SSPX affairs like opening new houses.
Lionel: The French Superiors need to discard the New Theology while interpreting Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), just as I do.In this way primarily there is doctrinal harmony within the community.There is no tension over Vatican Council II which would not contradict the old ecclesiology of the Church. There would also be doctrinal harmony with the sedevacantists and conservative Catholics. Since pre and post Vatican Council II ecclesiology would once again be exclusivist.
It is the French bishops who would now have to come in unity with the doctrines of the Church including Vatican Council II interpreted rationally ( invisible cases are invisible, there are no visible exceptions to EENS in 2017).It is the French bishops instead of the traditionalists, who will not be in harmony with the Deposit of the Faith.
So it is important for the French Superiors to reiterate the 2012 General Chapter Statement of the SSPX 1 and ask the local bishops to do the same.
For this reason it seems opportune that we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation- SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012
The doctrinal requirement for reconciliation with the Vatican, according to the General Chapter meeting, was affirming the dogma outside the church and there is no salvation and there being no known exceptions. The Vatican in 2012 refused to come back to the faith.Now the French superiors must repeat the 2012 demand.
_________________________________________
The letter also criticises Pope Francis for turning Catholic morals upside down by introducing Communion for adulterers: „We have no choice but to protect ourselves from such an authority.”
Lionel: Pope Francis presented a kerygma without the necessity of membership in the church.
Pope Francis did not tell the Lutherans that they are outside the Church and need to convert for salvation.They are on the way to Hell.
He does not tell the Jews that they are all oriented to Hell in 2017 according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14).
He does not tell the Muslims that they will all be going to the same place where Mohammad is and that there are no known exceptions according to Vatican Council II.(AG 7).
He does not tell the Jewish Left ( ADL etc) that Catholics are the new people of God(NA 4), they are the new Chosen People according to Vatican Council II.Neither do the French bishops seem to know this.
Pope Francis and the French bishops do not state that since there is no known salvation outside the Church, a priority for saving all souls is the non separation of Church and State. All political laws must have as their center Jesus Christ as he is known in the Catholic Church.
Pope Francis like the local French Bishops does not say that there is no salvation outside the Church according to Vatican Council II and so all Christians need to enter the Church with Catholic faith. For salvation they need the Sacraments of the Church and the traditional moral and faith teachings.
The French Superiors can bring all this to the attention of Pope Francis and the local French bishops by:-
1.Afirming Vatican Council with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism.
2.Affirming Vatican Council II without the New Theology and so with the old ecclesiology.When the New Theology is avoided we are automatically back to the old theology. We do not have to create any thing new.
3.Affirming Vatican Council II without the false premise and instead with a rational premise(we cannot physically see people in Heaven) and inference( invisible people cannot be visible exceptions to the dogma on earth in 2017).
4.Affirming invisible cases are invisible and invisible baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
They need to contradict Pope Benedict's March 2016 statement in the daily Avvenire which is supported by the French bishops.He said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century since there was a development with Vatican Council II. He meant Vatican Council II Cushingite(invisible cases are visible, so the baptism of desire is an exception to the dogma EENS). With Vatican Council II Feeneyite there is no development. Vatican Council II Feeneyite could be the cause of a rebellion by the French bishops.They may still want their false theology and false doctrines.
1.Afirming Vatican Council with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism.
2.Affirming Vatican Council II without the New Theology and so with the old ecclesiology.When the New Theology is avoided we are automatically back to the old theology. We do not have to create any thing new.
3.Affirming Vatican Council II without the false premise and instead with a rational premise(we cannot physically see people in Heaven) and inference( invisible people cannot be visible exceptions to the dogma on earth in 2017).
4.Affirming invisible cases are invisible and invisible baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
They need to contradict Pope Benedict's March 2016 statement in the daily Avvenire which is supported by the French bishops.He said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century since there was a development with Vatican Council II. He meant Vatican Council II Cushingite(invisible cases are visible, so the baptism of desire is an exception to the dogma EENS). With Vatican Council II Feeneyite there is no development. Vatican Council II Feeneyite could be the cause of a rebellion by the French bishops.They may still want their false theology and false doctrines.
French Superiors must know that Church doctrine and tradition is on their side they need to go on the offensive.Affirm Vatican Council II and let the French bishops rebel.-Lionel Andrades
1.
http://archives.sspx.org/superior_generals_news/2012_general_chapter/2012_general_chapter_statement_7-19-2012.htm
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment