Lionel's blog
At Medugorje the children
were shown Hell.They are still alive to talk about it.So don’t say nobody has
been to Hell or nobody has seen Hell.Others too have seen Hell. Numerous. They
talk about it on Youtube.- Lionel Andrades
https://medjugorje.com/description-of-hell/
The Archbishop of Palermo, Italy is a Cushingite.His excommunication of Fr. Alessandro M. Minutella was political. This is not just my opinion.Cushingism and Feeneyism can be verified.
Simply ask a question.
"Does Lumen Gentium 16 refer to a physically visible or invisible case in 2024".
The Archbishop and priest will have to say YES, an invisible case.This is Feeneyism.What is invisible is not confused as being visible.
When they both interpret Vatican Council II and other Church Documents with Feeneyism there is unity in doctrine and theology in the Catholic Church.
-Lionel Andrades
-Lionel
Andrades
The Vicar General of the diocese of Worcester, USA, interprets Church Documents ( Creeds, Councils, Catechisms, Vatican Councl II etc) with Cushingism. There is no denial from him or Bishop Robert McManus, the bishop of Worces- Lionel Andrades
The future ordination of priests of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) can
be opposed. They are all Cushingites and not Feeneyites.. This is dishonesty..- Lionel Andrades
According to Church Law and secular law, the Slaves of the Immaculate
Heart of Mary, in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, can refuse
to interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the
Creeds, Catechisms and Councils, with irrational Cushingism instead of rational
Feeneyism..- Lionel Andrades
St.Maximillian Kolbe in the 1930’s was a Feeneyite. But today the Franciscan Conventuals and the Franciscans in general
are Cushingite.- Lionel Andrades
All the books on Vatican Council II in general, are ‘false’. They are based upon Cushingism.
Cushingism is an objective error.It is not part of the Deposit of the Faith.
- Lionel Andrades
Eucharistic Adortation at Medugorje - 14/5/2024
https://video.marytv.tv/watch/mip8Mvsg1e0?ctx=yDj3O1j6sO8%2CmP9bEiEsi5K
There are two interpretations of the Creeds. It depends upon how you interpret the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I). If BOD and I.I are interpreted rationally or irrationally, the meaning of the Creeds change. The Rational or Irrational Premise, creates orthodoxy or heresy. With Feeneyism or Cushingism, the conclusion of the Creeds is traditional or non traditional.
Not only the Creeds change with the premise chosen but also Vatican Council II. We can interpret the baptism of desire (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) with the Rational or Irrational Premise.Then the Conclusion of Vatican Council II is either a continuity or a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
In the same way EENS itself is Feeneyite or Cushingite. When we interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, with the rational premise, then it supports EENS Feeneyite.This is EENS with BOD and I.I not being being exceptions . When we interpret BOD and I.I with the Irrational Premise then there is EENS with BOD and I.I being visible examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times. It is wrongly inferred that BOD and I.I are visible.They become practical exceptions for EENS.
NICENE CREED
1.So when the Nicene Creed states :‘We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins’ , we can interpret this line with the Rational or Irrational Premise, with Feeneyism or with Cushingism. The conclusion will be traditional or non traditional, orthodox or heretical.
APOSTLES CREED
2.When we say in the Apostles Creed,’ "I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints", it can be interpreted with the Rational or Irrational Premise, with Feeneyism or Cushingism. So for you, does the Holy Spirit teach the Catholic Church today that outside the Church there is no salvation or outside the Church there is salvation ?
ATHANASIUS CREED
3.We can read in the same way, the Athanasius Creed when it states : ‘Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.’
With the Rational Premise we are saying that everyone needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation and there are no known exceptions. With the Irrational Premise we are saying that everyone needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation but there are known exceptions.This is irrational Cushingism.It is contradictory. It does not make sense.
CDF 1949 LETTER A POLITICAL-LEFT DOCUMENT
The objective mistake, the New Theology, has come into the Church from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.The Letter was kept hidden for about three years before it was made public. The CDF Letter was part of the political-Left agenda to eliminate the dogma EENS in the Catholic Church. It supported heresy and schism with its New Theology.The New Theology says outside the Church there is known salvation; visible cases of non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water. The philosophical foundation for the New Theology is the Irrational Premise.
PREMISE DETERMINES ORTHODOXY OF CREEDS
Fr.Georges Laire, Judicial Vicar, in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, is still not clarifying the diocese doctrinal position on Vatican Council II( rational) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( rational) yet he maintains a Decree of Prohibitions against Brother Andre Marie micm, at the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA.
Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA, interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with Cushingism. For Brother Andre Marie Vatican Council II and EENS are Feeneyite.Cardinal Sean O Malley interprets the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed with Cushingism and I choose Feeneyism. We are both in the same Novus Ordo main line Catholic Church. - Lionel Andrades
Posts
