eucharistandmission: Maike Hickson and Steve Skojec cannot comment either way for or against and can get no help from the cardinals and bishops at the Vatican. They cannot show me where I am wrong and neither can they agree with me

Sunday, April 22, 2018

Maike Hickson and Steve Skojec cannot comment either way for or against and can get no help from the cardinals and bishops at the Vatican. They cannot show me where I am wrong and neither can they agree with me

Maike Hickson and Steve Skojec posted "Points of Rupture" of the Second Vatican Council II with the Tradition of the Church - a Synopsis ( April 13,2018. Blog 1Peter5) 1

Then I wrote that there was an error in six points in that Synopsis. They were clearly not a rupture with Tradition.While the other points were open to interpretation.

This is all new material on my blog for Maike Hickson and Steve Skojec.They cannot comment either way for or against.Maike Hickson can also get no help from the cardinals and bishops at the Vatican.

Vatican Council II for me is in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the missionaries in the 16th century, the Syllabus of Errors and an ecumenism of return.It is not a rupture with the Catechisms of Pius X and Trent.

Again. They cannot show me where I am wrong and neither can they agree with me.

If they refer to 'the official policy' on Vatican Council II of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) I would say the same observation and they would agree with me i.e "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ".

So when they agree that "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases " how can Vatican Council II be a rupture with Tradition?

They were following the 'official policy' of the SSPX and the liberals, which is based on an irrational inference.

Every year they keep repeating the same view.It's Paolo Pascualucci, Romano Amero, Mons.Brunero Gherardino, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Cardinals Kasper, Koch and Marx. They will not comment when I keep repeating "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases " how can Vatican Council II be a rupture with Tradition?

For them to start thinking we probably need a lightening bolt from Heaven.-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 14, 2018

This imporant point was overlooked by Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardini

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/this-imporant-point-was-overlooked.html

APRIL 15, 2018

Six of Pasqualucci's 'distinct points of rupture with the Tradition of the Church in the texts of the Vatican II documents' are not a rupture

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/six-of-pasqualuccis-distinct-points-of.html

APRIL 15, 2018

The interpretation of Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardini is irrational it can be seen in the text of the blog 1Peter5 : They misinterpreted hypothetical cases in Lumen Gentium, Unitatitis Redintegratio and Nostra Aetate as being objective people saved outside the Church.This was a mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/the-interpretation-of-paolo-pasqualucci.html

APRIL 18, 2018

Maike Hickson and Steve Skojec did not know that we can affirm hypothetical and speculative Lumen Gentium 8, 14, and 16 along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/maike-hickson-and-steve-skojec-did-not.html

APRIL 17, 2018

We can affirm hypothetical and speculative Lumen Gentium 8, 14, and 16 along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and this is not known to Paolo Pascualucci, the SSPX priests in Italy, Steve Skojec and Maike Hickson so Vatican Council II is presented as a rupture with Tradition http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/we-can-affirm-hypothetical-and.html

APRIL 15, 2018

Six of Pasqualucci's 'distinct points of rupture with the Tradition of the Church in the texts of the Vatican II documents' are not a rupture

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/six-of-pasqualuccis-distinct-points-of.html

APRIL 15, 2018

Image result for Paolo Pasqualucci Photos

Image result for Msgr. Brunero Gherardini Photos

The interpretation of Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardini is irrational it can be seen in the text of the blog 1Peter5 : They misinterpreted hypothetical cases in Lumen Gentium, Unitatitis Redintegratio and Nostra Aetate as being objective people saved outside the Church.This was a mistake http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/the-interpretation-of-paolo-pasqualucci.html

APRIL 14, 2018

Once this is understood we can always interpret Vatican Council II as affirming an ecumenism of return only

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/once-this-is-understood-we-can-always.html

JUNE 18, 2014

Cristina Siccardi ,Paolo Pasqualucci use the irrational inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/cristina-siccardi-paolo-pasqualucci-use.html

APRIL 14, 2018

Liberals would protest if Ferrara, Mattei and Fr.Zuhlsdorf interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite EENS, Syllabus of Errors and an ecumenism of return based on the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/liberals-would-protest-if-ferrara.html