Philosophy of Sacrilege

It starts with bad reasoning. First, the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are assumed to be personally known non Catholics, saved outside the Church, in the present times ( 1965-2018).Not for me.

Then it is reasoned that these known non Catholics saved outside the Church are also referenced in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc. So hypothetical cases are assumed to be objective. Unknown people are assumed to be known. Invisible non Catholics are projected as physically visible.
Not for me, invisible cases are just invisible.

With this alleged seen- in- the- flesh cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church, LG 8, LG 14 etc are assumed to be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

EENS is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.There is a rupture, a rejection.

Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with EENS and the baptism of desire (LG 14), baptism of blood and invincible ignorance(I.I) become exceptions to EENS, which is no more interpreted like in the past.

So no more is there the strict interpretation of EENS, and this is heresy.It is also schism with the popes and of the past on EENS.

It is with this heresy and schism today, that the priest in general, offers Holy Mass.

This is a mortal sin of faith. It is a rejection of a de fide teaching. This is a scandal for those who discern.With physically invisible BOD, BOB and I.I  which are exceptions to EENS, there is a new interpretation of the Nicene Creed. It is " I believe in not one baptism, there are three or more, they are the baptism of desire, blood and being saved in invincible  etc and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church".

This is first class heresy and it is common for a priest offering Holy Mass, in the old and new rite. So bad philosophy leads to heresy, schism and sacrilege which is the norm in the Catholic Church today.

-Lionel Andrades