How can a pope interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and inference and then still be a pope ?

Comments from the blog Vox Cantoris (Awaiting approval)

Vox Cantoris said...

Lionel,

It seems not what the point of the post is but you always dominate the comments with EENS.

I'm asking you from henceforth, Brother; stick to the topic or post once on the matter with why rationale or I will be forced to limit you as I have done in the past.

Please.

Lionel: 

Vox

Thank you for allowing the posts.

The issue is not just EENS and neither is it the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance.

The issue here is the two popes.

The issue is are they in heresy and do they have the right to be popes.

Is pope Benedict still the pope when he is in manifest heresy, doctrinally and no one contests it?

Can we say that Pope Francis is not the pope because he is in heresy and sacrilege when the traditionalists including Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted Magisterial documents contradicting each other and re-interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II irrationally and no traditionalist has a comment on this subject?

How can a pope interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and inference and then still be a pope ?

Should not Canon Law apply also to the CDF Prefect since on March 1 he irrationally interpreted LG 8 as a rupture with EENS and Ad Gentes 7 at the Placuet Deo Press Conference.n.

Is there not even one traditionalists blogger who can comment theologically and doctrinally on what I write ?

Why should Catholics follow the Leftist interpretation of Vatican Council II just because the popes and Archbishop Lefebvre did so ? What about mortal sins of faith ?....

-Lionel Andrades


http://voxcantor.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-bergoglian-anti-papacy-by-ann.html