The present two popes interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.The result is heresy.

The popes and saints over history accepted the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), when it was asked of them.But they knew that it was speculation. Something hoped-for.They could only be hypothetical.There were not concrete people.

So BOD, BOB and I.I could not be considered practical exceptions to the dogmatic teaching on all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.

However the liberal theologians, Ratzinger and Rahner and others,along with the Left, wanted to get rid of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So they wrongly projected BOD, BOB and I.I as not being hypothetical only-  but also visible and known examples of salvation outside the Church.

This became the New Theology - outside the Church there is salvation, there is known salvation.

So at Vatican Council II, BOD(LG 14), I.I(LG 16) was mentioned assuming that they were exceptions to EENS.This was an error in the Council-text.

Further more, new possibilities of salvation outside the Church were sought.The new possibilities, examples of salvation outside the Church are imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3), seeds of the Word outside the Church which lead to known  salvation(AG 11), elements of sanctification and truth without faith and baptism which lead to known salvation (LG 8) etc.

So there was the false premise ( outside the Church there is known salvation, invisible people are visible) and the false inference ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc are visible examples of salvation outside the Church and exceptions to EENS). The bottom line is that today we can interpret Vatican Council II with or without the false premise and inference and our conclusion will be different.

When we accept Vatican Council II with the false premise and inference I call it Cushingism.

When we accept Vatican Council II without the false premise and inference I call it Feeneyism. These terms are useful in a discussion.

Cushingism is irrational( physically invisible people are visible), non traditional ( outside the Church there is salvation) and heretical ( EENS is contradicted, the Nicene Creed is changed etc).
 

The present two popes interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.The result is heresy.
I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism the result is a return to the past exclusive ecclesiology and  an ecumenism of return.It is a return to the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. 

I can make a traditional Profession of Faith and recite and Oath Against Modernism.The popes cannot do so.Cushingism is modernism. The profession of faith is a Cushingite one. 
 The two popes now have to correct the error and re-interpret Vatican Council II rationally.They need to be Feeneyite on Vatican Council II. Otherwise the whole Church will continue to follow heresy.

 BENEDICT IS A CUSHINGITE

In 2016 when Pope Benedict said that extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century, this was Cushingism.
He could have disappointed ecclesiastical Masonry and announced that EENS today is the same as it was for the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century and there was no development with Vatican Council II.
Similarly Pope Francis can prove that he is not in heresy and  announce that EENS is the same today as it was over the centuries.He does not know of any practical exceptions in 2019.
But he will not do so since he wants to create heresy and a rupture with Tradition.This is important for the Left and Satan.
EENS and the Nicene Creed are de fide teachings and so we have the present two popes in mortal sins of faith.
 
Just as the divorced and remarried and those living in concubinage are in mortal sins of morals, there are also mortal sins of faith.Pope, cardinals, bishops and priests in mortal sins of faith should not offer Holy Mass.They first need to end the scandal in public and receive absolution in the Sacrament of Reconciliation with God. Otherwise the Mass is a sacrilege.
Similarly lay Catholics who cannot affirm Church teachings, which are obligatory for all in the one true faith,are in mortal sins of faith and are outside the Church.They have lost Sanctifying Grace which is necessary for salvation.
 When a pope does not affirm the faith, and is in mortal sin, he has lost Sanctifying Grace.
Even in the times of the Early Church, the Early Christians, those who committed a grave  sine were put out of the community. Only after penance , sometimes over a long time, were they allowed to re-enter.

Today we have the two popes in public mortal sins of faith.They have lost Sanctifying Grace and are outside the Church. They are automatically excommunicated.They need to rectify the scandal and make amends.
They need to proclaim the faith in spirit and truth.
-Lionel Andrades