Even traditionalists like Roberto dei Mattei, Chris Ferrara,John Henry Weston, Taylor Marshall, Michael Matt and conservatives Fr.John Zuhlsdorf,Michael Voris, Raymond Arroyo, Robert Royal,Fr. Gerald Murray and EWTN apologists, will choose Vatican Council II Cushingite.They will not even talk/write about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) being in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite), the Catechisms( Feeneyite) and the Creeds interpreted with Feeneyism.If they did choose Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology they could get a legal notice.

Yesterday afternoon I went to the basilica of St. Mary Majors, Rome where there is continuous Eucharistic Adoration in one of the side chapels which ends after Vespers at 4.30 p.m.I also went for Confession, in English.

A few years back there was a Brazilian Dominican priest here in one of the Confessionals, who affirmed the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and gave me permission to quote him. He said that this was the teaching of the Church.

Though he did not want me to record his statement on a digital camera which I had.I asked him if I could do so, since he was sure of himself. He said no.
After I posted his statement on my blog the  Dominicans removed him immediately as a Confessor there.Or they would come under some Leftist law. So even his  Confessional was taken out.

ANTI SEMITIC PROHIBITION ON CATHOLIC PRIESTS AND PROFESSORS

The Vatican and the Vicariate in coordination with the Jewish Left, associated with Israel, places a prohibition on Catholic priests.They are not allowed to  affirm Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism i.e hypothetical cases are just hypothetical and not objective exceptions to EENS(Feeneyite). They have to choose Cushingism i.e invisible and hypothetical cases are really objective and personnaly known in the present times and so they are practical exceptions to EENS( Feeneyite).There is a new understanding of EENS, with exceptions. This is EENS ( Cushingite).
God bless that honest Brazilian priest.
Yesterday I wanted to ask at the Sacristy if there was a bishop or priest present to whom I could speak. But then I realized that if he spoke honestly it could be the end of his 'career'.I would only making trouble for him.
How can a bishop or priest affirm magisterial documents with Feeneyism and still be in good standing with the Church ?
The present two popes, and the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) know that they are teaching error by using Cushingism.They artificially create a rupture with Tradition ( Syllabus of Errors etc).
But they continue to teach heresy.

Even traditionalists like Roberto dei Mattei, Chris Ferrara,John Henry Weston, Taylor Marshall, Michael Matt and conservatives Fr.John Zuhlsdorf,Michael Voris, Raymond Arroyo, Robert Royal,Fr. Gerald  Murray and EWTN apologists, will choose Vatican Council II Cushingite.They will not even talk/write about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)  being in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite), the Catechisms( Feeneyite) and the Creeds interpreted with Feeneyism.If they did choose Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology they could get a legal notice.
-Lionel Andrades