Saturday, December 28, 2019

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano is stuck in his theological formation


Apostolicnuncio viganoholy 600 1.jpg

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano was the Cushingite Secretary General of the Governorate of the Vatican City State and he was also the Cushingite Nuncio  to the USA where he was critical of Medugorje on a doctrinal point.
He spoke at the Voice of the Family conference in Rome along with Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, both, seemingly ignorant of Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite).
Now in hiding from  LGBT fascists, within and outside the Church, he kept silent when Pope Francis  told school children in Rome that Jews and Muslims  do not need to convert.
Pope Francis was really following the same theology of Archbishop Vigano.
Vigano probably offers the Latin MAss  with the Benedict-Farncis ecclesiology and still calls himself a traditionalist, as do the others.
Archbishop Vigano, does not say that all Jews and Muslims according to Vatican Council II(AG 7) need 'faith and baptism' for salvation and that there are  no personally known exeptions to AG 7 for us human beings.
If he did say this, ecclesiastical Masonry would call him a Feeneyite. They would say that Pope Pius X condemned Fr. Leonard Feeney - for not saying unknown cases of the baptism of desire, could not be known exceptions to traditional EENS. 
Or they will say that Pope Pius XII condemned him, for his strict interpretation of EENS which was not a rupture with the Magisterium of the 16th century.
Archbishop Vigano was born before the Fr. Leonard Feeney issue, the Boston Case.So there must have been some period in his life when he was exposed to traditional EENS. Silvio Berlusconi remembers the time when the Redemptorists taught him as a school boy, that outside the Church there was no salvation.
But after the Boston Case, Vigano remained a priest teaching Cushingism( invisible people are visible). When he spoke at the Voice of the Family  conference in Rome, he was still a Cushingite.Many in the audience there could have been Lefebvrists, Cushingites. For them the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I)  would be exceptions to EENS. Similarly Lumen Gentium 16( invincible ignorance) in Vatican Council II  would also be an exception to EENS. So they would then reject Vatican Council II and accept visible- for- them- BOD, BOB and I.I.
This was Vigano's religious and theological formation.It was the same for Cardinal Bruke and Bishop Athansius Schneider.
Now what stops Vigano from speaking the truth- he's in hiding. He does not have to protect his 'reputation' , career and finances.
He cannot proclaim the faith on exclusive salvation!
He cannot speak the truth on this subject. He's a Cushingite. He's stuck in his theological formation.-Lionel Andrades





 DECEMBER 27, 2019

Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise



No comments: