Francsicans at the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome have to support mortal sins of faith, through theology, in order to become Catholic priests.

 

Francsicans at the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome have to support mortal sins of faith, through theology, in order to become Catholic priests.

Yesterday I met a few Franciscans who are studying theology at the Jesuit-Jewish Left Gregorian Pontifical University here.They are forced to study there if they want to become priests.There is no other choice. The other pontifical universities are also Cushingite and just as bad.

They will really have to follow Satan and proclaim these mortal sins of faith, using convoluted theology and bad reasoning, of which they are aware.

MORTAL SINS OF FAITH

1.Have you denied the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) ?

2.Have you changed the meaning of the Nicene Creed with allegedly known cases of the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood (BOB), and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) ?

3.Have you rejected the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation?

4.Have you rejected the Catechism of Pope Pius X which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and non Catholics are outside the Church?

5.Have you rejected the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX which says Protestants have to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation, there can only be an ecumenism of return ?

6.Have you rejected the Apostles Creed which says 'I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church ', which means the Church still teaches outside the Church there is no salvation ?

7.Have you rejected Vatican Council II which is in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),the past exclusive ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

8.Have you rejected the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994)which is in harmony with the past catechisms  and the strict interpretation of EENS according to the Magisterium of the 16th century ?

9.Have you rejected the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 when it assumes unknown cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are known exceptions to the dogma EENS ?

10.Have you rejected the common, wrong interpretation of Vatican Council II which assumes  invisible people mentioned in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are visible exceptions to EENS in 2019 ?

11.Have you proclaimed the necessity of believing in Jesus without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church ?

12.Have you interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise ( invisible people are visible) and inference ( these visible people are examples of salvation outside the Church and exceptions to EENS) and then projected Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition( EENS, past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return etc) ?

-Lionel Andrades