Bishop Steven J.Lopes interprets unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as being known exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or EENS, as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century. He will not recant.He expects Fr. Vaughn Treco to interpret Vatican Council II in the same irrational way, to create a rupture with de fide teachings of the Church.

 

 

He wants the priest to affirm heresy and irrationality just as he does  and so was allowed to complete his doctorate in theology and study at the Pontifical Gregorian University.

If Bishop Lopes did not recant traditional teachings of the Church on faith and morals, he would not be allowed to receive a theological degree or be an assistant to the Cardinal-Prefect of the CDF who also supported heresy for ideological reasons.

Bishop Steven J.Lopes interprets unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as being known exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or EENS, as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century.

He will not recant.He expects Fr. Vaughn Treco to interpret Vatican Council II in the same irrational way, to create a rupture with de fide teachings of the Church.He wants Fr. Vaughn Treco to recant by rejecting de fide teachings of the Church like outside the Church there is no salvation.

He wants Fr. Treco to recant the traditional and rational interpretation of BOD, BOD,BOB and I.I  and EENS.

He wants the priest to recant the traditional interpretation of the Nicene Creed.

He wants the priest to recant by rejecting  the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.

He wants the priest to affirm heresy and irrationality just as he does  and so was allowed to complete his doctorate in theology and study at the Pontifical Gregorian University, administered by the Jewish and Jesuit-Left.

If Bishop Lopes did not recant traditional teachings of the Church on faith and morals, he would not be allowed to receive a theological degree or be an assistant to the Cardinal-Prefect of the CDF who also supported heresy for ideological reasons.

Fr. Vaughn Treco also interprets Vatican Council II and magisterial documents with the same irrationality as Bishop Steven J.Lopes but he rejects the conclusion.

It is the same with the SSPX.They interpret Vatican Council II irrationally,blame the Council and then reject the conclusion of their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.

-Lionel Andrades