SSPX wrongly interprets the Second Vatican Council with irrational Cushingism instead of Feeneyism : SPX FAQ Videos

The speaker above interprets extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance as being personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church.The SSPX bishops, priests and seminarians do the same. Also the writers of the books they recommend do the same.

Similarly the SSPX interprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. So LG 8 etc refer to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church. They were visible people. Since invisible people could not be examples of salvation outside the Church. Invisible people cannot be exceptions to the EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

Bishop Bernard Fellay the past Superior General of the SSPX has an online report interpreting Vatican Coucil II with the Cushingite irrationality and then blaming the Council for the expected non traditional conclusion.

-Lionel Andrades