When I say there is a schism from the Left I am identifying a reality which can be corrected.It is not permanent.The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) can make an announcement and correct the common error.
I affirm all magisterial documents. I am not in schism or a sedevacantist.I affirm Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
1.When I say that there are no personally known and visible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance in our reality every one agrees with me.
2.When I say that Vatican Council II(Ad Gentes 7) says all need faith and baptism for salvation, every one agrees with me.
So this is basically what I have to say. The ordinary means of salvation, the norm for salvation is faith and baptism and there are no known exceptions.There is no known salvation outside the Church. There is no known extraordinary means of salvation for us human beings.
The popes,cardinals and bishops can agree with me on these two points.
So we are back to the old ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and outside the church there is no salvation without rejecting Vatican Council II. Instead Vatican Council II is my primary reference.
So the ecclesiastics at the CDF would agree with me on these two important points which can end the present schism from the Left.
Now that we know there is no known salvation outside the Church we can correct the error.Possibilities of salvation outside the Church are known only to God are not real people in 2019. So there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II or the Catechism of the Catholic Church to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. 1
People usually say that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are exceptions to the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) when they really should be saying that they are not exceptions.
They should address the issue of schism in the Catholic Church created with the interpretation of magisterial documents with irrational Cushingism, especially Vatican Council II.2
Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and Creeds and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with the irrational premise and so the schism is corrected. He can stop doing this and tell others to do the same.
Division is caused when the popes, cardinals and bishops interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality to create a division and rupture with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors).They could begin by explaining the difference between Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise and a Council interpreted without it.They could then show how Vatican Council II with the false premise is divisive and schismatic and without this error, the Church returns to orthodoxy. -Lionel Andrades
1
2
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment