SALVATION: WHAT EVERY CATHOLIC SHOULD KNOW
By Michael Patrick Barber
Ignatius Press, 2019

On EWTN none of the apologists are allowed to say that invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance cannot be visible exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
They are also not allowed to say that invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc are not physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict 16th century EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
EWTN and Ignatius Press are censored so nothing much can be expected from them when they produce another book on salvation in line with the new ecclesiology.
When Catholic Answers held their annual conference last year, they clarified that they were Christological in their apologetics. They did not say, and it was understood, that they did not support an exclusivist understanding of salvation. 
Since for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) referenced in Vatican Council II and placed in the Denzinger was correct and Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center were wrong.
But now we know, that whatever is one's opinion on Fr. Leonard Feeney, Lumen Gentium 8 and Lumen Gentium 16 always refer to an invisible case. Always-past,present and future.
So there is no change in the Catholic Church's understanding of salvation after LOHO and Vatican Council II. The Council is Feeneyite with Ad Gentes 7( all need faith and baptism for salvation) and LG 8 etc are not practical exceptions to Ad Gentes 7. This is a point  missed out by the books on salvation from Ignatius Press, EWTN and Catholic Answers.-Lionel Andrades