Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism; with the false premise instead of without it, to create a rupture with ex cathedra and infallible teachings of the Church.

Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism; with the false premise instead of without it, to create a rupture with ex cathedra and infallible teachings of the Church. He broke with the traditional interpretation of the Creeds and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Pope Francis canonised him.Pope Benedict did not object.Instead he earlier conferred the title of Venerable on him.
 

Pope Paul VI's re-interpretation of the Creeds and EENS, with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) being exceptions, was schism with the popes over the centuries.

BOD, BOB and I.I were always hypothetical for the popes and saints over the centuries.They could not be any thing else.
 

Now even the Bologna School of Alberto Melloni, the Bose community of Enzo Bianchi and Andrea Riccardi's Sant Egidio community are in schism with the past popes on the Creeds, EENS and the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27Q).They interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.Then they heretically reject or change the Creeds and other magisterial documents.

Pope Paul VI was in manifest public heresy and schism and yet was canonised.He was in rebellion since with an objective error he interpreted BOD, BOB and I.I and Vatican Council II.Then he created an artificial rupture with the past.This cannot be magisterial.The Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake. He may have done this in ignorance.He was not corrected by Cardinal Wojtyla and Archbishop Marcel Lefevbvre, if they knew about it.-Lionel Andrades