The Southern Poverty Law Center, Associated Press, Reuters and the rest of the Left accuse traditionalists of not accepting 'the reforms of Vatican Council II'. They mean Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, inference and conclusion. They do not refer to Vatican Council II interpreted with a rational premise and inference creating a traditional conclusion. So this is false information on the Council from them.A correction and a clarification is needed.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, Associated Press, Reuters and the rest of the Left accuse  traditionalists of not accepting 'the reforms of Vatican Council II'. They mean Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, inference and conclusion. They do not refer to Vatican Council II interpreted with a rational premise and inference creating a traditional conclusion. So this is false information on the Council from them.A correction and a clarification is needed.

REFORMS ONLY WITH IRRATIONALITY

When Vatican Council II is viewed with a rational premise and inference there are no ' reforms of Vatican Council II'.The Council supports the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed ( outside the Church there is no salvation).So the post Vatican Council II ecclesiology today is the same pre-Vatican Council II ecclesiology of the saints Ignatius, Xavier and Bellarmine.

Unitatis Redintigratio in Vatican Council II with its reference to hypothetical cases(UR 3 etc) does not contradict the traditional ecumenism of return.

There is nothing in Lumen Gentium to contradict the past ecclesiology, since LG 8, LG 14 and LG 16 refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases only, in 1965-2020.

Nostra Aetate does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation. AG 7 is cited in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the sub-title Outside the Church there is no salvation.NA 2 is not an exception to AG 7.

POPE BENEDICT MADE A MISTAKE

So the secular media must clarify that the books written by Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict, Cardinal Christoph Schoborn, Fr. Aidan Nicols o.p and many others, published by Ignatius Press and others, are written with a false premise and inference to create a non traditional conclusion.This is an artificial rupture with Tradition( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).This is also the mistake of the  mainstream media.

They have interpreted the Creeds, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and other magisterial documents, with the common false premise and inference.

Books have been published with this error.They confuse what is invisible as being visible.The unknown is projected as the known.How can unknown cases of LG 8, LG 16 and UR 3 be known exceptions to the past ecclesiology ?
These books with mis-information are re printed by Ignatius and other publishers,  with new editions and no clarification.

ATHANASIUS CREED OBSOLETE

There are errors in the book Credo for today, since Pope Benedict interprets the Creed with the false premise and inference, which I call Cushingism.1  The Athanasius Creed ( outside the Church there is no salvation) is made obsolete.He could also interpret magisterial documents with the false premise and inference. I call this Feeneyism.
 It is the same with Cardinal Ratzinger's Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus.They are Christological only.They reject the ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.They are Cushingite.

Pope Benedict's interpretation of the Patristic period is also Cushingite.He interprets invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) as being known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus. 2  The Church Fathers interpreted BOD, BOB and I.I as hypothetical cases. They could not be anything else. BOD, BOB and I.I cannot be objective cases for human beings. So they were not practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.So there was the Feeneyite EENS for the missionaries in the 16th century and there is a Cushingite EENS for Pope Benedict today. 

FANTASY THEOLOGY
 For Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS and so also are LG 14( baptism of desire) and invincible ignorance ( LG 16) in Vatican Council II.They are physical bodies in Newton's time and space allegedly saved outside the Church.In other words visible in Heaven or on earth.How can they be visible in Heaven and on earth at the same time?.

His interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church and general catechesis also violates the Principle of Non Contradition. 3

The confusion is there in his books on ecclesiology.4

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA, 2, GS 22 etc are seen by him, as being exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally becomes an artificial rupture with Tradition. 5  He did not choose Vatican Council II , Feeneyite. He wanted the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.

These books should not be made available for students at the pontifical and secular universities in Italy and especially Rome, since they are written with a false premise and inference.
 

Similarly the books of Pope Benedict/Cardinal Ratzinger are translated in German for theology students at the German Catholic university of Euchstadt-Ingolstadt, in the archdiocese of Cardinal Reinhardt Marx.
 
They are now obsolete and should be removed.Similarly an article on ecclesiology in German by Cardinal Ratzinger, should not be there on line.

Pope Benedict like the SPLC, AP, Reuters and other organizations must clarify that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a rational premise and inference.The  conclusion is traditional. It supports 16th - century EENS.This is the rational interpretation of  also the Catechisms, Creeds and the dogma EENS.There is no rupture with the missionaries and Magisterium of the Middle Ages.

MEDIA MUST CORRECT REPORTS

The popes and the Leftist media must no longer interpret Catholic magisterial documents with the irrational premise and inference to create a non traditional conclusion, and then present this as Catholic-teaching.Books with this error need to be phased out and new books written on the Council.They would support the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return with no known exceptions and Feeneyite EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I not being known exceptions.To persist with the same type of reporting in the news agencies and newspapers and with the same reasoning in new books, would be unethical.-Lionel Andrades

1

FEBRUARY 2, 2020

Cardinal Ratzinger is a Cushingite and has interpreted the Nicene Creed with a false premise and inference which was not the understanding of the past centuries.Ignatius Press has published Credo for Today addressed to Christians and not Catholics. The Nicene Creed can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism and the conclusion would be different.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/cardinal-ratzinger-is-cushingite-and-so.html

2

FEBRUARY 2, 2020

Literal and objective errors mark Pope Benedict's books published by Ignatius Press.He has interpreted the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II irrationally

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/literal-and-objective-errors-mark-pope.html

3

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/literal-and-objective-errors-mark-pope.html

4.

JANUARY 14, 2020

Ignatius Press needs to pull back Pope Benedict's book on ecclesiology since it was written with a false interpretation of Vatican Council II.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-pull-back-pope.html

5

JANUARY 21, 2020

Ignatius Press needs to stop publishing books on Vatican Council II by authors who interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA, 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Books written by Pope Benedict also carry this error https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-stop-publishing.html

____________________________________________________

DECEMBER 20, 2012

Archbishop Gerhard Muller says that the SSPX needs to distinguish the true teaching of the Second Vatican Council: but he will not correct Reuters  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/12/archbishop-gerhard-muller-says-that.html

REUTERS MAKES AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE ON CATHOLIC DOCTRINE AND ECCLESIA DEI/ CDF DO NOT CLARIFY
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/reuters-makes-objective-mistake-on.html#links

REUTERS MAKES FACTUAL,OBJECTIVE MISTAKE TOO
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/reuters-makes-factualobjective-mistake.html#links

WASHINGTON POST REPORT ON SSPX WRONG ON CATHOLIC DOCTRINE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/washington-post-report-on-sspx-is-wrong.html#links

JULY 19, 2018

Nicole Winfield of the Associated Press and Phillip Pullela of Reuters continue the propaganda on Vatican Council II by assuming LG 16 refers to a visible and known person saved outside the Catholic Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/nicole-winfield-of-associated-press-and.html

OCTOBER 14, 2015

No denial from Phillip Pullela and Nicole Winfield    https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/10/no-denial-from-phillip-pullela-and.html

______________________________________

JULY 18, 2018

Whatever is your opinion of Fr. Leonard Feeney, LOHO, Pope Pius XII etc if LG 16 is invisible or visible determines the interpretation of Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/whatever-is-your-opinion-of-fr-leonard.html         http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/archbishop-guido-pozzo-does-not-affirm.html

JULY 18, 2018Whether you believe in the Bologna School or what ever how you look at LG 16 determines how you interpret Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/whether-you-believe-in-bologna-school.html

JANUARY 15, 2017 Media chooses Vatican Council II (Cushingite) instead of Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : approved magisterial heresy  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/01/media-chooses-vatican-council-ii_15.html

OCTOBER 27, 2015Associated Press blacks out information on magisterial heresy : AP reports on Vatican Council II were based on a factual error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/associated-press-blacks-out-information.html  

JANUARY 13, 2017Thomas D.Williams calls for a reform in the Church with a new theology and new doctrines which are heretical and irrational but politically correct with the Left, of which he now is a part of   http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/thomas-dwilliams-calls-for-reform-in.html

OCTOBER 28, 2015 The Vatican has made a mistake and there is a cover up by liberal journalists  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-vatican-has-made-mistake-and-there.html

JULY 18, 2018

If you cite Archbishop Lefebvre, Pope Pius XII and the Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) you are interpreting LG 16 as referring to known people saved outside the Church.You are following this train of thinking.http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/if-you-cite-archbishop-lefebvre-pope.html

DECEMBER 11, 2015

Traditionalists like Reuters correspondents use Cushingism to interpret Vatican Council II : Feeneyism cannot be part of the dialogue http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/12/traditionalists-like-reuters.html

Religion correspondents keep prudently silent on Magisterial Error in Vatican Council II :Vatican's CDF made a mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/development-of-error-in-catholic-church_26.html

Cardinal Kaspar changed ecclesiology assuming B is an exception to A : he used an irrational model to interpret Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/cardinal-walter-kasper-said-in.html

Vatican Council II has an error : secular journalists, cardinals and bishops don't know what to do  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/vatican-council-ii-has-error-secular.html

Religion journalists : did the Magisterium made a mistake?    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/religion-journalists-did-magisterium.html

 FEBRUARY 1, 2020

German theologian Marianne Schlosser a professor of theology at the University of Vienna and recipient of the 2018 Ratzinger Prize, interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and non traditional conclusion which says outside the Catholic Church there is salvation.She accepts the New Theology of Pope Benedict and Pope Francis and so she is given the award.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-theologian-marianne-schlosser.html

    
JANUARY 24, 2020
Questions and Answers   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/questions-and-answers.html  
JANUARY 21, 2020
Irrationality taught to Catholic children at home and in the schools.This is a family issue https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/irrationality-taught-to-catholic.html

______________________________________________________________________

TERMS CLARIFIED 

 BOD( Baptism of Desire . Case of the unknown cathechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is allegedly saved and now in Heaven)

BOB (Baptism of Blood. The case of unknown person who is in Heaven as a martyr without the baptism of water)

I.I (Invincible ignorance: The case of an unknown non Catholics who is in Heaven without faith and baptism and instead in invincible ignorance.)

LG 8 ( Lumen Gentium 8: The case of the unknown person saved outside the Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth' or where the true Church of Christ allegedly subsists.

 LG 14 (Lumen Gentium 14:  Baptism of Desire . Case of the unknown cathechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is allegedly saved and now in Heaven)

LG 16 ( Lumen Gentium 16: The case of the unknown person saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance and who is now in Heaven without faith and the baptism of water) 

UR 3 (Unitatitis Redintigratiio 3, Vatican Council II : The case of the unknown Christian, who is saved in his religions without Catholic faith or the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and is allegedly known to someone on earth who has seen him or her in Heaven).

NA 2(  Nostra Aetate 2: The case of  the unknown non Catholic saved outside the Catholic Church without faith and baptism. He or she is saved with good and holy things in other religion or with the a ray of that Truth which enlightens all mankind.

GS 22 (Gaudium et Specs 22. The case of the unknown non Catholic who is saved outside the Catholic Church. He or she is saved without faith and baptism but with goodwill.

FALSE PREMISE DEFINED 

Their false premise is:-

1. Invisible people are visible.

2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.

3.The unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.

4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.

5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.

6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).

7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking  who are saved outside the Church.

8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.

9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.

10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/bradley-eli-at-church-militant-tv-uses.html

 With the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed, there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-

1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.

2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over the centuries referred  to only one known baptism, the baptism of water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.

3. The Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation outside the Church.Now  unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.

6.With the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a hypothetical case only.

7.Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration  etc were all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/cardinal-reinhold-marx-of-munich.html