Fr.Anthony Pillari interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errrors of Pope Pius IX etc) and so he has to go back to the Baltimore Catechism and avoid the Catechism of the Catholic Church.If he did not use the false premise to interpert Vatican Council II , the Council would not be a break with Tradition.He could also interpret the Baltimore Catechsm, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Catechism of Pope Pius X, as being in harmony with Vatican Council II

 Fr.Anthony Pillari interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errrors of Pope Pius IX etc) and so he has to go back to the Baltimore Catechism and avoid the Catechism of the Catholic Church.If he did not use the false premise to interpert Vatican Council II , the Council would not be a break with Tradition.He could also interpret the Baltimore Catechsm,the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Catechism of Pope Pius X, as being in harmony with Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades