The St. Benedict Center is not using a false premise to interpret Magisterial documents like the CDF and Rev. de Laire : Their use of the false premise is unethical.It is a public lie and they are forcing it upon all Catholics in New Hampshire

 It has been a one way correspondence with the Curia in the Diocese of Manchester, USA.They do not respond when asked for a comment. 

I have many times e-mailed Mary Ellen Mahon, Cabinet Secretary for Catholic Formation and Director of Pastoral Ministry,Meredith Cook,Chancellor, Kelly Goodreau, Director of Parish Faith Formation, Fr. Matthew Mason and members of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal.

They all seem to agree withme. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases only in 2020-2021.There are no objections or corrections from them. 

So LG 8, LG 16 etc are not objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church for them. They are not practical exceptions to 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), which the media calls the 'rigorist' interpretation of EENS.

So for Bishop Peter Libasci and his Curia, the baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance(LG 16, CCC 847,848) would not be exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.

This would also be the rational consensus of thousands of people in New Hampshire, in the Diocese of Manchester,if they were asked randomly.Since it is common sense.

But this is the point which is not addressed by the Judical Vicar in the Diocese of Manchester, Rev. Georges de Laire and the Archbishop-Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia.

They are presently censoring Brother Andre Marie MICM and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, who  interpret Vatican Council II, the dogma EENS, the Catechism of the Catholic Church( when the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincble ignorance are referred to)without the false premise. So there are no practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS which they support. 

I repeat, the St. Benedict Center is not using a false premise to interpret Magisterial documents like the CDF and Rev. de Laire.

The CDF and Bishop Libasci    want Catholics in the diocese to interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 16 etc), the Catechism of the Catholic Church( 847-848) and BOD, BOB and I.I with a false premise i.e invisible cases are visible, unknown cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church are physically visible in 2020-2021.

So people who do not exist are projected as objective exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS which the CDF and the liberal bishop will not affirm.

The false hypothesis of the diocese also makes the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX obsolete.

Their use of the false premise is unethical.It is a public lie and they are forcing it upon the St. Benedict Center. -Lionel Andrades

https://www.simchafisher.com/2021/02/05/nh-judicial-vicar-sues-michael-voris-for-recklessly-false-statements/