When Taylor Marshall and Eric Sammons in this video interpret Vatican
Council II with a false premise, false inference and non traditional conclusion
they are also re-interpreting the Athanasius, Apostles and Nicene Creeds with
the false premise and so are changing the traditional meaning of the Creeds.
They would also be re-interpreting the Catechisms, irrationally.In this way
they support the liberals.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 16, 2021
Both of them in this video have missed the point. The New Ecumenism comes from a precise doctrinal and theological change. A subtle false premise. The New Evangelisation comes from the same New Theology.We cannot re-claim Traditional Mission with the use of the false premise.
Both of them in this video have missed the point. The New Ecumenism comes from a precise doctrinal and theological change. A subtle false premise. The New Evangelisation comes from the same New Theology.We cannot re-claim Traditional Mission with the false premise.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 16, 2021
Eric Sammons used the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and then suggest there is known salvation outside the Church; visible non Catholics saved without faith and the baptism of water and instead with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance( all without the baptism of water).In this way they became practical exceptions to the 'absolutist' category of salvation, the strict interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation.
Eric Sammons used the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and then suggest there is known salvation outside the Church; visible non Catholics saved without faith and the baptism of water and instead with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance( all without the baptism of water).In this way they became practical exceptions to the 'absolutist' category of salvation, the strict interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation.
So his Salvation Spectrum includes the speculative categories exclusivist, reserved,moderate, expansive, pluralist, universalist.
With these categories exclusivist, reserved,moderate, expansive, pluralist and universalist, created with the false premise, he projects practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed which says all need the Catholic faith for salvation.He is also rejecting the absolutist interpretation found in the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
- Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 14, 2021
AUGUST 14, 2021
There is an objective and factual error in Eric Sammons new book Deadly Indifference. His Salvation Spectrum is based upon the irrational premise he uses to interpret Vatican Council II.Without the objective mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus he would be left with only the ‘absolutist’ interpretation, in his spectrum.Now he chooses the New Theology.
There is an objective and factual error in Eric Sammons new book Deadly Indifference. His Salvation Spectrum is based upon the irrational premise he uses to interpret Vatican Council II.Without the objective mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus he would be left with only the ‘absolutist’ interpretation, in his spectrum.Now he supports the New Theology.
Secondly Fr. Leonard Feeney was not condemned for his strict interpretation of EENS. The excommunication was lifted with him having to recite the Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for salvation. Vatican Council II has the same message. Ad Gentes 7 states all need faith and baptism for salvation.
So if he interpreted the Council II and EENS rationally there would be no ‘ongoing debate on extra ecclesiam nulla salus’ as he has titled a report on Crisis Magazine.
In order to make the Salvation Spectrum more understandable, I’ve created a chart to lay out the various views:
https://www.crisismagazine.com/2021/the-ongoing-debate-over-extra-ecclesiam-nulla-salus
If Eric Sammons interpreted Vatican Council II and EENS like Lionel Andrades and not the liberal professor of theology, Gavin D’Costa at the University of Bristol, England his interpretation would be rational and traditional. Now it is liberal and still political, like that of Joseph Shaw, John Rao, the late Mons. Brunero Gherardino and Jim Russel the liberal contributor to Crisis Magazine.They all accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 from which Sammons gets his New Theology. The Letter employs the false premise to produce schism and heresy which is officially approved by the popes.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
___________________
AUGUST 4, 2021
Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council IIhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html
AUGUST 13, 2021
Today when Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise it cannot be Magisterial. This is an important point that Eric Sammons does not discuss
AUGUST 13, 2021
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment