Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei cannot justify heresy and schism by saying that Pope Francis is also doing the same.If someone goes for the Latin Mass it does not make him a traditionalist.Lefebvrists support heresy, schism and division, with the False Premise.It is the same as the liberals. They don’t deny it.

 

To change the interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincibile ignorance, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors, the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 ( invincible ignorance) etc by confusing invisible cases as being visible and practical examples of salvation outside the Church is condoning artificial heresy. It  results in schism with the present Magisterium.

I have mentioned that the Lefebvrists Roberto dei Mattei, Joseph Shaw, Maike Hickson, John Henry Weston and Archbishop Vigano also confuse hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, lG 16 etc as being practical exceptions to EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors.

For them there are literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14). Implicit cases are projected as being explicit examples of salvation among non Catholics in 1965-2021.All this is irrational.It is also heretical.It contradicts EENS, Athanasius Creed  and schism( a break with the Council of Trent etc ).This creates division in the Church with the False Premise ( invisible cases are visible in 2021, there are practical exeptions for EENS etc ).

This is also the heresy and schism of the popes  from Pope Pius XII ( on EENS) and Pope Paul VI ( Vatican Council II).The mainstream Catholic Church has to choose the Rational Choice ( invisible cases are invisible, LG 14 refers to a hypothetical and theoretical case only in 2021).

Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei cannot justify heresy and schism by saying that Pope Francis is also doing the same.

If someone goes for the Latin Mass it does not make him a traditionalist.Lefebvrists support heresy, schism and division, with the False Premise.It is the same as the liberals. They don’t deny it.

Eric Sammons, the Editor in Chief of Crisis Magazine does not deny it.He uses the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, EENS etc.Like Allen Shreck and Scott Hahn at the Faculty of Theology, University of Steubenville, Ohio,USA,he interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with the False Premise just like Pope Francis.They do not deny it. They agree with me.

Crisis Magazine states that they are a voice for the faithful Catholic laity.They are faithful to the liberal teachings of the Catholic Church; with the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.

With the False Premise Sammons creates heresy and schism which are mortal sins of faith.Then he asks for donation.Remember this when you send them your donations. It is the same with LifeSite News and John Henry Weston.Like Peter Kwasniewski and the other Lefebvrists they are denying Tradition and they are asking for donations from traditionalists.They interpret Magisterial documents like the liberals.

I do not use the False Premise and I do not ask for donations.-Lionel Andrades

OCTOBER 7, 2021

Cardinal Marx and Michael Matt Editor Remnant News use the same False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II

 

Both Cardinal Marx and Michael Matt are using the same Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so break with Tradition, especially Magisterial Documents which support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.Michael Matt is the Editor of Remnant  TV. He believes that there is division  between traditionalists and liberals.This is seen in the Latin Mass for him.But this division was really created  by the False Premise.This was not know to Archbishop  Marcel Lefebvre.It was also unknown to Cardinal Marx.

If they all simply used the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II there would be a continuity with Tradition, especially ecclesiocentrism.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall have said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire(LG 14).There are no explicit cases of the implicit baptism of desire of St. Thomas Aquinas.But for the liberals and traditionalists the baptism of desire is explicit.Physically visible. So extra ecclesiam nulla salus becomes obsolete for Cardinal Marx and Michael Matt.-Lionel Andrades

OCTOBER 6, 2021

Pope Francis and Cardinal Marx can no more cite Vatican Counci lII to support the German Synodal Way, since the False Premise has been discovered by Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall.Lumen Gentium 14 etc are exceptions to Tradition, for the pope and cardinal and not exceptions to Tradition, for the bishop and lay apologist.This is a new reality before the German bishops

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/pope-francis-and-cardinal-marx-can-no.html

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome,

Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail