All the German theological journals are unaware of this.

 

In Germany the official media and public institutions of the government cannot continue to interpret Vatican Council II and other Church Documents with a Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion, which is heretical and schismatic.Presently all the German theological journals are unaware of this.                             -Lionel Andrades

 OCTOBER 18, 2021

230 German theologians use the same False Premise as Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Mattei and Ferrara

                                                                                                                                   -Lionel Andrades

 

OCTOBER 18, 2021

Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted the Athanasius Creed, Nicene Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with the Fake Premise and so did the SSPX bishops and priests. This is heresy. It is also schism with the past Magisterium over the centuries, which did not use the same Premise

 

Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted the Athanasius Creed, Nicene Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with the Fake Premise and so did the SSPX bishops and priests. This is heresy. It is also schism with the past Magisterium over the centuries, which used the Rational Premise to create the old theology.SSPX lay supporters  today are also in heresy and schism unless they avoid the False Premise. Heresy and schism are mortal sin of faith. Peter Kwasniewski, Joseph Shaw, Eric Sammons, Michael Matt, Matt Gaspers, Edward Pentin and John Henry Weston have no denial.Their interpretation of Magisterial Documents is heretical and schismatic. Catholics are following them.

John Henry Weston interviewed Eric Sammons and neither of the two of them affirm the teaching outside the Church there is no salvation. There are exceptions for them.This is heresy and schism. How can there be practical exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2021 for them ? This is Cushingism and not Feeneyism.

Chris Ferrara debated Mark Shea on the subject outside the Church there is no salvation and both used the False Premise. They are Cushingites in a break with the past Magisterium.

Roberto dei Mattei has written that outside the Church there is no salvation but with the False Premise.So he changes the interpretation of EENS but also the Catechisms, Vatican Council II, the Creeds etc- this is heresy and schism.

Maria Guarani’s blog Chiesa e Post Concilio has a home page full of reports and videos on Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise.This is all now obsolete.

How can those who support heresy and schism and

division call themselves  Catholics ?Traditionalists 

cannot also be liberals who use a Fake Premise.-Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

Writer on Vatican Council II being dogmatic and not only pastoral.It is in harmony with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Athanasius Creed etc.

It is found that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other irrational. Since one uses a Rational Premise and the other a False Premise.One is Magisterial with the past Magisterium and the other, the common one, has an objective error  and so cannot be Magisterial.It is the same with the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.

Why should Catholics choose the irrational version which is heretical, non traditional, liberal and schismatic, while a rational option is there, which is traditional ?.

__________________