Questions on Twitter : 3.The bishops have made it quite clear that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance do exist.

 

Questions from Twitter : The bishops have made it quite clear that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance do exist.

Yes they exist only in our mind. If there was any such case it would only be known to God. For us humans, these are only hypothetical cases. Similarly for the popes and saints over the centuries, these were only hypothetical cases. They were not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake when it projected BOD and I.I as being objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. So now there is a New Theology which says outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation, when really there cannot be known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. -Lionel Andrades

MAY 12, 2022

Questions on Twitter : 1. Is your interpretation of the baptism of desire subjective and not that of the Church?

 

Questions on Twitter

1.          Is your interpretation of the baptism of desire subjective and not like that of the Church?

My interpretation of the baptism of desire is rational. There can only be a rational interpretation of BOD, which is always hypothetical and speculative only. It does not refer to a physically visible person saved outside the Church in the present times. There are no objective cases of the baptism of desire. This was known in the Church for centuries. This is common knowledge. The BOD can only refer to a theoretical case and be an expression of good will. It is not a particular person seen or known. This is common sense.  

My interpretation of BOD is Magisterial in the sense it is in harmony with the past Magisterium and I do not use the False Premise ( invisible cases are visible, BOD refers to a visible person saved outside the Church).

The interpretation of the present two popes would be Magisterial when they do not use the False Premise.

They have an option. The False Premise is dishonest.  -Lionel Andrades

_______________________  

MAY 12, 2022

Questions on Twitter : 2. What about the grace-doctrine?

 

Questions on Twitter

2. What about the grace-doctrine?

God's grace is there in potential for all. As long as a person is alive on earth, he is not condemned. But if a person dies with mortal sins of faith or morals, and does not avail of the Sacrament of Confession, he chooses to be damned.

Now is the time of God’s mercy and grace which is available for those who repent and choose to follow the Gospel.

Those who are outside the Catholic Church, choose to be condemned. John 3:5 and Mark 16: 16 tell us that faith and baptism are needed for salvation. To reject or change the teachings of the Catholic Church are mortal sins of faith.

This has been the teaching of the Catholic Church for centuries. It still is the teaching of the Church when Vatican Council II is interpreted with the Rational Premise and there is a continuity with the past exclusivist ecclesiology. So the teachings of the Church on this faith issue has not changed with Vatican Council II ( Rational).- Lionel Andrades

MAY 5, 2022

If Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then the Council becomes Traditional and he supports Tradition and the Catholic Church becomes Traditional

 If Pope Francis pinterprets Vc2 with the Rational Premise then the Council becomes Traditional and he supports Tradition, and the Church becomes Traditional.- Lionel Andrades 

WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF 

VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1

___________________