Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider want division in the Church otherwise they could be hit with a leftist excommunication as it was for Fr. Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Lefebvre.

 

FR.LEONARD FEENEY'S EXCOMMUNICATION WAS POLITICAL

Fr.Leonard Feeney was saying that there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire. This is reality. It is a fact. His excommunication was political by the Left. The Archbishop of Boston and Pius XII were saying that invisible cases of the BOD were visible examples of salvation.

ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE'S EXCOMMUNICATION WAS LEFTIST

Even the excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was political-left. He refused to accept Vatican Council II in which invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 14 and 16 etc were projected as visible exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Tradition.

Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger accepted it.They accepted Vatican Council II interpreted with the Irrational Premise to produce a non tratitional conclusion.

Pope Pius XII did not tell the Archbishop of Boston and the Jesuits that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were not visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. Instead they silenced the priest.

THEY DID NOT TELL ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY

Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that he could interpret Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 8,14 and 16 etc not being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. So he could return to Tradition without rejecting Vatican Council II.

Today Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider will not tell traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, to interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus rationally. They will not say in public that Vatican Council II is not a break with Feeneyite EENS.

POPES FRANCIS AND BENEDICT FOR POLITICAL REASONS ARE INTERPRETING VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY.

Pope Francis and Pope Benedict for political reasons will not say that Vatican Council II does not contradict the Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for salvation. They want to pretend that LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to visible cases. Irrational?!

For political reasons the popes and Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider want division in the Church. Otherwise the bishops could be excommunicated like Fr. Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Lefebvre.

The ADL had also asked for the excommunication of Bishop Richard Williamson.Even though he committed no mortal sin of faith or morals Pope Benedict side lined him. Williamson was not obliged to accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally by Pope Benedict.This is the political interpretation of the Council.It is unethical.

Pope Benedict wanted Bishop Bernard Fellay to accept Vatican Council II as a break with EENS. Why? This is irrational and dishonest.

WE NOW KNOW HOW TO CREATE THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH TRADITION

Pope Pius XII after World War II allowed division to come into the Church. It can be ended today. Since we know how to always create the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.The Council is not ambiguous.Bishop Schneider said in one of his three interviews this month that the Council is ambiguous. He interpreted the Council as a break with Tradition. So he chose the Irrational Premise of the liberals.

THE PROFESSION OF FAITH IS DIFFERENT SINCE THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CREEDS IS DIFFERENT

It is because of the Irrational Premise, that the Profession of Faith of Mon.Nicola Bux and the bishops, is different from mine. We can have unity when he chooses to interpret Magisterial Documents rationally as I do.

For political left reasons Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally like Prof. Roberto dei Mattei of the Lepanto Institute, Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider. May be it is due to leftist coercion within and outside the Church.-Lionel Andrades