Steve Bannon does not ask Bishop Athanasius Schneider the question important for conservatives and the center right

 

Steve Bannon interviews Bishop Athanasius Schneider this month and does not ask the question which would be important  for conservatives and the center right. The question is: If Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally, with the Rational Premise and Inference, then would the Council become conservative, orthodox, ecclesiocentric and traditional? 

The answer is: Yes!

Then if Vatican Council II is conservative, orthodox, ecclesiocentric and traditional, when invisible cases of LG 8,14,15,and 16 refer to invisible cases in 2022, then there are no objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus? Yes.

We are back to Tradition, with Vatican Council ? Yes.

If Vatican Council II is ambigous and there are passages which contradict traditional passages then it means the Irrational Premise is being chosen? Invisible cases are visible? Answer: Yes.

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS TRADITIONAL

1.There is no ambiguity in Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II(See graphic below). The passage in red refers to hypothetical cases.So the red passages do not contradict the blue orthodox passages which support traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Red is not an exception for the Blue.

1.

________

2.The Red is not an exception to the Blue also in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. There is no ambiguity. 

2.

______________

3.

If the Red was an exception to the Blue in the Catechism of the Catholic Church then there would be ambiguity.It would mean the Irrational Premise is being chosen. The Red passages are interpreted as being visible, seen in the flesh, objective and practical cases in the present times. So they become objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

3.

______________________

4.

In the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847 would contradict 846 if it referred to objective cases in 2022. It would mean this is a reference to a physically visible example of salvation. So there are practical exceptions for the orthodox blue passages which support Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

4.

__________________

5.The Red passage in CCC 847 refers to a hypothetical case always. So it does not contradict the blue orthodox passage in CCC 846. 

5.

____________

6.

Again there is no ambiguity in Vatican Council II when the hypothetical passages in Red do not contradict the orthodox passages in Blue in Lumen Gentium 14.

6.

___________

So Vatican Council II is not ambiguous. It supports the past ecclesiocentrism only. Only. There is only one rational interpretation. Then there is only one ethical interpretation. The Council is traditional, orthodox and ecclesiocentric.To interpret the Council with the Irrational Premise( the Red is an exception to the Blue) would be dishonest.-Lionel Andrades

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z7ZgsVeCm9qS/

Bishop Athanasius Schneider: The Formative Years Of Religion

https://rumble.com/v1pnmht-bishop-athanasius-schneider-the-formative-years-of-religion.html