The Minim Fathers at the basilica of Sant Andrea delle Fratte Rome are abjuring the Catholic faith and encouraging other religious, in the parish in central Rome, to do the same

 

The Minim Fathers at the basilica of Sant Andrea delle Fratte Rome are abjuring the Catholic faith and encouraging other religious, in the parish in central Rome, to do the same, for political - Left reasons.

They confuse what is invisible as being visible  to  re-interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, as a break with Tradition. They need this irrationality. So then Vatican Council emerges as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as it was held by Alphonse Ratisbonne and St.Maximillian Kolbe.

So their theology is Christocentric and not traditional Ecclesiocentrism. It is Jesus without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation (to avoid Hell).

With the False Premise (invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14 LG 16, UR 3 etc are visible) they create objective exceptions for the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.Their theology is liberal, new and modernistic.

The basic issue is not theology but their false observation.

They assume that what is not there is there. People saved with the baptism of desire are not there but it is assumed that they are there.

People saved in invincible ignorance are not there in our human reality but the Minim priests assume that they are there. So they do not believe like Alphonse Ratisbonne that there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.They project exceptions when exceptions do not exist.

They do not believe that non Christians and non Catholics must convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell (for salvation),with no known exceptions.

So when they use the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, EENS (baptism of desire etc) it is dishonesty.They are changing the interpretation of the Creeds, Catechisms, dogma EENS,Vatican Council II etc.-Lionel Andrades

WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF 

VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1

___________________