The present two popes are unethical and dishonest. This shows in the admission policy of the pontifical universities.

 

The present two popes are unethical and dishonest. This shows in the admission policy of the pontifical universities.

Those who get admission in the pontifical universities to study philosophy, theology, canon law etc, have to give up the Catholic Faith by interpreting Magisterial Documents with a Fake Premise. This is unethical academically. It is dishonest. It is approved by the present two popes.

They have to project unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), as being known and visible exceptions, for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This is irrational. There are no visible cases of BOD and I.I in our reality.

They have to project hypothetical and speculative cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, as being non-hypothetical and objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed. This Creed says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.So again, the demand upon the student, is to be irrational.

Students and faculty have to pretend, as if Unitatis Redintigratio 3 in Vatican Council II, refers to a visible and personally known Christian-Baptist, Pentecostal etc – who is saved in Heaven in ‘imperfect communion’ with the Church.This is even though there is no such case in our reality. The irrationality is important for those who want a New Ecumenism and not the past ecumenism of return to the Church. So the hypothetical case in UR 3 is projected as a practical exception for EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS.

So to sit through the semesters and give the exams, the student or seminarian, at the pontifical and secular universities ( La Sapienza etc) in Rome, have to affirm a False Premise (  invisible cases are visible in 1965-2022), False Inference ( they are practical exceptions for EENS and the Syllabus of Errors) and False and Non Traditional Conclusion (Vatican Council II is  a break and not continuity with Tradition).

The use of this False Premise to change Church teachings is unethical. It is dishonest and not Catholic, even though it is approved by the popes.

Since I do not interpret Vatican Council II, EENS and other Magisterial Documents with the False Premise, I cannot get admission into the University of St.Thomas Aquinas ( Angelicum),Rome or the Legion of Christ’s University Pontifical Regina Apostolorum, Rome. It would be the same at the Jesuit, Pontifical Gregorian University, and Rome.

Meanwhile all the professors at these universities – Catholic and non Catholic, have to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise. -Lionel Andrades

WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF 

VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1

___________________